Richards David, Bee Penny, Loftus Samantha, Baker John, Bailey Lorna, Lovell Karina
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Sep;51(6):634-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03550.x.
This paper reports a study to evaluate the impact of an innovative 18-day educational intervention for acute ward-based mental healthcare nursing staff on documented quality of nursing care and on service user views of that care.
There are grave concerns internationally about the quality of inpatient mental health care for people with acute psychiatric problems. It is claimed that specialist educational courses are needed to improve these services. However, whilst such courses may lead to positive learning outcomes for participants, the impact on the actual care of service users is unknown.
An uncontrolled before-and-after evaluation of three acute mental health wards from different United Kingdom National Health Service trusts was carried out. Quality of nursing care was evaluated by extracting documentary evidence from service user records, assessed by two independent researchers according to predefined quality criteria. The views of a purposive sample of mental health service users, currently receiving services from the three designated wards, were ascertained by semi-structured interview.
Both documentary evidence and service user views revealed some important baseline deficiencies in the quality of care offered at the study sites. Following the educational intervention, statistically significant improvements were observed in the quality of care planning, initial assessments and the provision of therapeutic care. No statistically significant changes were observed in the quality of risk assessments, medication management or external agency involvement.
Education can have an impact on nursing care but may not be sufficient alone to change mental healthcare practices on acute inpatient wards in the radical manner demanded by policymakers and service user lobby groups. Educational interventions need to be implemented in conjunction with organizational changes that are specifically designed to maximize the opportunities presented by a newly skilled and positive workforce.
本文报告一项研究,以评估一项针对急性病房精神科护理人员的为期18天的创新性教育干预措施对记录的护理质量以及服务对象对该护理的看法所产生的影响。
国际上对急性精神疾病患者的住院精神卫生护理质量深感担忧。据称需要专业教育课程来改善这些服务。然而,尽管此类课程可能会使参与者取得积极的学习成果,但对服务对象实际护理的影响尚不清楚。
对来自英国国民健康服务体系不同信托机构的三个急性精神科病房进行了无对照的前后评估。通过从服务对象记录中提取书面证据来评估护理质量,由两名独立研究人员根据预先确定的质量标准进行评估。通过半结构化访谈确定了一个有目的抽样的正在接受这三个指定病房服务的精神卫生服务对象的看法。
书面证据和服务对象的看法均显示研究地点提供的护理质量存在一些重要的基线缺陷。在教育干预之后,观察到护理计划质量、初始评估和治疗性护理提供方面有统计学上的显著改善。在风险评估质量、药物管理或外部机构参与方面未观察到统计学上的显著变化。
教育可以对护理产生影响,但可能不足以单独以政策制定者和服务对象游说团体所要求的激进方式改变急性住院病房的精神卫生护理实践。教育干预需要与专门设计的组织变革相结合实施,以最大限度地利用新技能和积极的员工队伍带来的机会。