• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤外科手术的结果:手术量有影响吗?

Outcomes in oncologic surgery: does volume make a difference?

作者信息

Bentrem David J, Brennan Murray F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1210-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7991-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-005-7991-x
PMID:16136281
Abstract

Commonly performed elective surgical procedures on the alimentary tract are carried out with low morbidity and low mortality in most hospitals in the United States. There are some procedures on the alimentary tract that are performed with a relatively low frequency and are associated with higher mortality. Volume is a surrogate marker associated with improved outcome, with relative differences being dependent on the complexity of the procedure and the frequency with which it is done. Both surgeon and institutional volume matters, but it seems that improved operative mortality can be reached with lower surgeon volume in high-volume institutions. It appears that volume can be substituted in part for by specialization and training, with improved outcomes based on specialist credentials and fellowship training.

摘要

在美国的大多数医院里,常见的消化道择期手术的发病率和死亡率都很低。消化道的一些手术实施频率相对较低,且死亡率较高。手术量是与改善预后相关的一个替代指标,相对差异取决于手术的复杂性及其实施频率。外科医生的手术量和机构的手术量都很重要,但在手术量大的机构中,似乎较低的外科医生手术量也能实现手术死亡率的改善。似乎手术量可以部分地被专业化和培训所替代,基于专科资质和进修培训可改善预后。

相似文献

1
Outcomes in oncologic surgery: does volume make a difference?肿瘤外科手术的结果:手术量有影响吗?
World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1210-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7991-x.
2
An attempt to analyze the relation between hospital surgical volume and clinical outcome.一项分析医院手术量与临床结果之间关系的尝试。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;55(12):483-92. doi: 10.1007/s11748-007-0172-0. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
3
[Patient volume and quality in surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm].[腹主动脉瘤手术的患者数量与质量]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Apr 4;137(7):529-537. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0718. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.复杂胃肠道手术:医疗服务提供者经验对临床和经济结果的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):46-56. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00072-1.
5
Does volume help predict outcome in surgical disease?
Adv Surg. 2005;39:379-453. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2005.04.007.
6
Is case volume the only surrogate for oncologic surgical quality?病例数量是肿瘤外科手术质量的唯一替代指标吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):14-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9676-1. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
7
Individual surgeon mortality rates: can outliers be detected? A national utility analysis.个体外科医生死亡率:能否检测出异常值?一项全国性效用分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 31;6(10):e012471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012471.
8
Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement.急危重症普通外科手术后 30 天结局比较:具有针对性改进的潜力。
Surgery. 2010 Aug;148(2):217-38. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.05.009.
9
The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.肝胰胆外科手术中的手术量-结局效应:医院与外科医生的贡献及两者关系的特异性
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Apr;208(4):528-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.007.
10
Alimentary tract surgery in the nonagenarian: elective vs. emergent operations.九十岁老人的消化道手术:择期手术与急诊手术
J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;8(5):539-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.03.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality performance indicators for the surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.胃腺癌外科治疗的质量绩效指标:系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep;92(9):1995-2002. doi: 10.1111/ans.17583. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
2
Improving quality through process change: a scoping review of process improvement tools in cancer surgery.通过流程变革提高质量:癌症手术中流程改进工具的范围综述
BMC Surg. 2014 Jul 19;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-45.
3
Clinical competence in the surgery of rectal cancer: the Italian Consensus Conference.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.并发症对食管及食管胃交界部癌切除术后结局的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jan;198(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.007.
2
National variation in operative mortality rates for esophageal resection and the need for quality improvement.食管切除术手术死亡率的全国差异及质量改进需求。
Arch Surg. 2003 Dec;138(12):1305-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1305.
3
Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.
直肠癌手术的临床能力:意大利共识会议
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;29(7):863-75. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1887-x. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
Determinants of surgical decision making: a national survey.手术决策的决定因素:一项全国性调查。
Am J Surg. 2013 Dec;206(6):970-7; discussion 977-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.018.
5
Clinical review: Can we predict which patients are at risk of complications following surgery?临床综述:我们能否预测哪些患者术后有并发症风险?
Crit Care. 2013 May 7;17(3):226. doi: 10.1186/cc11904.
6
Opportunities of improvement in the management of pancreatic and periampullary tumors.胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤管理方面的改善机遇。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;48(5):617-25. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.781218.
7
Failure to comply with NCCN guidelines for the management of pancreatic cancer compromises outcomes.不符合 NCCN 胰腺癌管理指南会影响治疗效果。
HPB (Oxford). 2012 Aug;14(8):539-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00496.x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
Accomplishments in 2008 in the management of localized pancreatic cancer.2008年局部胰腺癌管理方面的成就。
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009 Sep;3(5 Supplement 2):S37-42.
9
Prognostic impact of RT-PCR-based detection of peritoneal micrometastases in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing curative resection.基于 RT-PCR 检测在接受根治性切除术的胰腺癌患者中腹膜微转移的预后影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(12):3333-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0683-2. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
10
Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators.基于正式制定的质量指标对美国胰腺癌护理情况的评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16;101(12):848-59. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp107. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
美国外科医生手术量与手术死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa035205.
4
The volume-outcome relationship in cancer surgery: a hard sell.癌症手术中的手术量-预后关系:难以被接受。
Ann Surg. 2003 Dec;238(6):777-81. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000098616.19622.af.
5
Hospital volume, length of stay, and readmission rates in high-risk surgery.高危手术中的医院手术量、住院时间和再入院率。
Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):161-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000081094.66659.c3.
6
Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.癌症手术中的医院手术量与手术死亡率:一项全国性研究。
Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):721-5; discussion 726. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.721.
7
An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.可切除性胰腺腺癌手术管理的循证方法
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jun;196(6):954-64. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00010-3.
8
Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection.将外科医生手术量与医院手术量相比较,作为原发性结肠癌切除术后预后的预测指标。
J Surg Oncol. 2003 Jun;83(2):68-78; discussion 78-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.10244.
9
Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy.医院手术量和经验对胰十二指肠切除术患者院内死亡率的影响。
Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):509-14. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000059981.13160.97.
10
Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: a decision analysis.医院规模对老年患者特定癌症手术后预期寿命的影响:一项决策分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Mar;196(3):410-7. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01753-2.