Suppr超能文献

依那普利与非洛地平及其联合用药的血流动力学比较。

Hemodynamic comparisons of enalapril and felodipine and their combination.

作者信息

Morgan T O, Anderson A

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Kidney Int Suppl. 1992 May;36:S78-81.

PMID:1614072
Abstract

Thirty-six patients (33 male, 3 female) with a mean age of 67 years and a diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 115 mm Hg, after a four-week placebo run-in period entered a double-blind crossover study comparing felodipine 5 and 10 mg with enalapril 5 and 10 mg and their combination (enalapril 5 mg + felodipine 5 mg). Combined therapy caused a fall in blood pressure of 24/16 mm Hg at trough level that was greater than the falls with the higher doses of monotherapy. The fall with felodipine was greater than with enalapril. Similar patients responded to felodipine and enalapril but more patients achieved blood pressure control with felodipine. When patients not controlled with enalapril 5 mg had felodipine 5 mg or enalapril 5 mg added, felodipine was more effective at lowering blood pressure than the increase in enalapril dosage. A similar effect occurred in those not controlled with felodipine 5 mg. Adverse effects occurred in 22 patients on felodipine, 14 patients on enalapril and 8 on combined therapy. The lipoprotein profile was not altered significantly. Glomerular filtration rates as assessed by 24-hour creatinine clearance were 90 ml/min at randomization, 125 ml/min on felodipine, 108 ml/min on enalapril and 120 ml/min on the combination. Felodipine and enalapril in low doses are effective antihypertensive agents in elderly people. Felodipine monotherapy is more effective than enalapril monotherapy but a greater blood pressure lowering effect can be obtained with the combination of low doses of enalapril and felodipine. This has the advantage that the number of side effects is less.

摘要

36例患者(33例男性,3例女性),平均年龄67岁,舒张压在95至115毫米汞柱之间,经过为期4周的安慰剂导入期后,进入一项双盲交叉研究,比较非洛地平5毫克和10毫克、依那普利5毫克和10毫克以及它们的联合用药(依那普利5毫克 + 非洛地平5毫克)。联合治疗在谷值水平使血压下降24/16毫米汞柱,大于高剂量单一疗法的血压下降幅度。非洛地平引起的血压下降幅度大于依那普利。相似的患者对非洛地平和依那普利均有反应,但更多患者使用非洛地平实现了血压控制。当使用5毫克依那普利未控制血压的患者加用5毫克非洛地平或增加依那普利剂量时,非洛地平在降低血压方面比增加依那普利剂量更有效。在使用5毫克非洛地平未控制血压的患者中也出现了类似效果。22例使用非洛地平的患者、14例使用依那普利的患者以及8例接受联合治疗的患者出现了不良反应。脂蛋白谱未发生显著改变。通过24小时肌酐清除率评估的肾小球滤过率在随机分组时为90毫升/分钟,使用非洛地平时为125毫升/分钟,使用依那普利时为108毫升/分钟,联合用药时为120毫升/分钟。低剂量的非洛地平和依那普利是老年人有效的抗高血压药物。非洛地平单一疗法比依那普利单一疗法更有效,但低剂量依那普利和非洛地平联合使用可获得更大的血压降低效果。这具有副作用数量较少的优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验