Reinemeyer C R, Rohrbach B W, Grant V M, Radde G L
Department of Environmental Practice, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-4500.
Vet Parasitol. 1992 Apr;42(1-2):111-22. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90107-k.
A sample of 126 sheep producers in Tennessee was randomly selected from the members of a statewide organization of sheep producers. Data about the participants' farms, sheep, parasite control practices and sources of information regarding ovine parasite control were obtained by a telephone survey. The response rate was 99%. The typical respondent kept 20 lambs, 20 ewes and 2 rams on three pastures totalling 20 acres. In order of decreasing frequency, anthelmintics were given according to a regular schedule, to coincide with breeding management procedures, or to treat clinical signs of parasitism. Proportions of producers deworming the various classes of sheep zero, one, two, three, four or more than four times annually were as follows: lambs--3, 28, 40, 16, 9 and 8%, respectively; ewes--3, 8, 20, 16, 34 and 22%, respectively; rams--1, 9, 19, 15, 38 and 19%, respectively. The majority of respondents planned to deworm lambs (89%) and ewes (82%) the same number of times in the following year. Of the producers who dewormed sheep two or more times during 1989, 39-49% (ranges include different proportions for lambs, ewes and rams) used the same anthelmintic exclusively, and 51-61% used two or more drug classes. Of the owners using a single anthelmintic exclusively, most (39-66%) used ivermectin, followed by levamisole (19-33%) and benzimidazoles (13-24%). One hundred and three of 124 (83%) producers intended to use the same anthelmintics in the future. Sixty-four of 124 (52%) producers had discontinued using at least one ovine anthelmintic. The most common reasons for discontinuance were dissatisfaction with the clinical response after treatment and inconvenience of administration. Sheep-oriented publications, other sheep producers and veterinarians were considered the most important sources of information about deworming programs and choice of anthelmintics.
从田纳西州一个全州性绵羊养殖者组织的成员中随机抽取了126名绵羊养殖者作为样本。通过电话调查获取了有关参与者农场、绵羊、寄生虫控制措施以及绵羊寄生虫控制信息来源的数据。回复率为99%。典型的受访者在三块总面积为20英亩的牧场上饲养20只羔羊、20只母羊和2只公羊。按照频率递减顺序,驱虫药按照常规时间表给药,与繁殖管理程序同步,或用于治疗寄生虫病的临床症状。每年对各类绵羊进行零次、一次、两次、三次、四次或四次以上驱虫的养殖者比例如下:羔羊分别为3%、28%、40%、16%、9%和8%;母羊分别为3%、8%、20%、16%、34%和22%;公羊分别为1%、9%、19%、15%、38%和19%。大多数受访者计划在次年对羔羊(89%)和母羊(82%)进行相同次数的驱虫。在1989年对绵羊进行两次或更多次驱虫的养殖者中,39% - 49%(范围包括羔羊、母羊和公羊的不同比例)仅使用同一种驱虫药,51% - 61%使用两种或更多类别的药物。在仅使用单一驱虫药的养殖者中,大多数(39% - 66%)使用伊维菌素,其次是左旋咪唑(19% - 33%)和苯并咪唑(13% - 24%)。124名养殖者中有103名(83%)打算在未来使用相同的驱虫药。124名养殖者中有64名(52%)已停止使用至少一种绵羊驱虫药。停药的最常见原因是对治疗后的临床反应不满意以及给药不便。以绵羊为导向的出版物、其他绵羊养殖者和兽医被认为是关于驱虫计划和驱虫药选择的最重要信息来源。