McLaws Mary-Louise, Berry Geoffrey
NSW Hospital Infection Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;26(8):715-9. doi: 10.1086/502608.
To determine whether the conventional rate for central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infection (BSI) accurately reflects risk for patients exposed for a variety of in situ periods.
Intensive care unit patients (n = 1,375) were monitored for 7,467 CVC-days. They were monitored until catheter removal, until diagnosis of CVC-associated BSI, or for 24 hours after discharge.
The BSI rate was 3.7 per 1,000 CVC-days. Ninety-three percent of these patients had CVCs in situ for 1-15 days. These patients were exposed to 59.7% of all CVC-days; the remaining 7% were exposed to 40.3% of all CVC-days. BSI rates stratified by exposure periods of 1-5 and 6-15 days were 2.1 and 4.5 per 1,000 CVC-days, respectively. The rates for 16-30 and 31-320 days were 10.2 and 2.1 per 1,000 CVC-days, respectively. The probability of BSI with a CVC in situ was 6 in 100 by day 15, 14 in 100 by day 25, 21 in 100 by day 30, and 53 in 100 by day 320.
The conventional aggregated rate better reflects the risk for the majority of patients rather than for patients exposed to the majority of CVC-days. It does not reflect the true probability of risk for all exposures, especially beyond 30 days. CVCs in situ from 1 to 15 days had less risk of BSI than CVCs in situ more than 15 days, which may explain why scheduled CVC replacement at days 5 to 7 has not been found beneficial.
确定中心静脉导管(CVC)相关血流感染(BSI)的传统发生率是否能准确反映不同留置时间患者的感染风险。
对重症监护病房的1375例患者进行了7467个CVC日的监测。监测持续至导管拔除、诊断出CVC相关BSI或出院后24小时。
BSI发生率为每1000个CVC日3.7例。这些患者中93%的CVC留置1 - 15天。这些患者占所有CVC日的59.7%;其余7%的患者占所有CVC日的40.3%。按1 - 5天和6 - 15天的暴露时间分层的BSI发生率分别为每1000个CVC日2.1例和4.5例。16 - 30天和31 - 320天的发生率分别为每1000个CVC日10.2例和2.1例。CVC留置时发生BSI的概率在第15天时为100例中有6例,第25天时为100例中有14例,第30天时为100例中有21例,第320天时为100例中有53例。
传统的汇总发生率更能反映大多数患者的风险,而非暴露于大多数CVC日的患者的风险。它不能反映所有暴露情况下的真实风险概率,尤其是超过30天的情况。留置1至15天的CVC发生BSI的风险低于留置超过15天的CVC,这可能解释了为何未发现第5至7天定期更换CVC有益。