Heishman Stephen J, Boas Zachary P, Hager Marguerite C, Taylor Richard C, Singleton Edward G, Moolchan Eric T
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Intramural Research Program, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Addict Behav. 2006 Jul;31(7):1116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
Previous studies have shown that cue-elicited tobacco craving disrupted performance on cognitive tasks; however, no study has examined directly the effect of cue-elicited craving on memory encoding and retrieval. A distinction between encoding and retireval has been reported such that memory is more impaired when attention is divided at encoding than at retrieval. This study tested the hypothesis that active imagery of smoking situations would impair encoding processes, but have little effect on retrieval. Imagery scripts (cigarette craving and neutral content) were presented either before presentation of a word list (encoding trials) or before word recall (retrieval trials). A working memory task at encoding and free recall of words were assessed. Results indicated that active imagery disrupted working memory on encoding trials, but not on retrieval trials. There was a trend toward impaired working memory following craving scripts compared with neutral scripts. These data support the hypothesis that the cognitive underpinnings of encoding and retrieval processes are distinct.
先前的研究表明,线索诱发的烟草渴望会干扰认知任务的表现;然而,尚无研究直接考察线索诱发的渴望对记忆编码和提取的影响。已有报告指出编码和提取之间存在差异,即在编码时注意力分散比在提取时对记忆的损害更大。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即吸烟场景的主动意象会损害编码过程,但对提取影响不大。意象脚本(香烟渴望和中性内容)在单词列表呈现之前(编码试验)或单词回忆之前(提取试验)呈现。评估了编码时的工作记忆任务和单词的自由回忆。结果表明,主动意象在编码试验中干扰了工作记忆,但在提取试验中没有。与中性脚本相比,渴望脚本后工作记忆有受损的趋势。这些数据支持了编码和提取过程的认知基础是不同的这一假设。