Suppr超能文献

整群随机对照试验

Cluster randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Puffer Suezann, Torgerson David J, Watson Judith

机构信息

York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2005 Oct;11(5):479-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00568.x.

Abstract

Cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT), in which groups or clusters of individuals rather than individuals themselves are randomized, are increasingly common. Indeed, for the evaluation of certain types of intervention (such as those used in health promotion and educational interventions) a cluster randomized trial is virtually the only valid approach. However, cluster trials are generally more difficult to design and execute than individually randomized studies, and some design features of a cluster trial may make it particularly vulnerable to a range of threats that can introduce bias. In this paper we discuss the issues that can lead to bias in cluster randomized trials and conclude with some suggestions for avoiding these problems.

摘要

整群随机对照试验(RCT)越来越普遍,在这类试验中,是个体的群组而非个体本身被随机分组。实际上,对于某些类型干预措施(如用于健康促进和教育干预的措施)的评估而言,整群随机试验几乎是唯一有效的方法。然而,整群试验通常比个体随机研究更难设计和实施,并且整群试验的一些设计特征可能使其特别容易受到一系列会引入偏差的威胁的影响。在本文中,我们讨论了可能导致整群随机试验出现偏差的问题,并最后给出了一些避免这些问题的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验