Katsuragi Hiroaki
Department of Microbiology, Nippon Dental University School of Dentistry at Niigata, 1-8 Hamaura-cho, Niigata 951-8581, Japan.
Odontology. 2005 Sep;93(1):80-5. doi: 10.1007/s10266-005-0054-9.
This article reports on the implementation of a problem-based learning (PBL) tutorial in our advanced program for second year students within an existing curriculum. The program was opened on the last 5 days of the summer vacation and students could volunteer to be part of the group. Students separated themselves into small groups by random sampling. The PBL tutorials were done during the first 3 days for medical problems according to our original scenarios (based on medical cases), and during the last 2 days, students made presentations of their learning outcomes, using information technology (IT) by themselves. Throughout this program, students were expected to engage in self-learning, except for a 1(1/2)-h group session with a tutor. Assessment was done by attendance at a group session and by portfolio analysis. Following the portfolio analysis, students identified the number of learning issues (group A, 26 +/- 7 issues; group B, 20 +/- 3 issues; group C, 21 +/- 7 issues). Research, by questionnaire, revealed that 84% of the students were strongly interested in each scenario and 95% of the students felt familiar with each scenario. The levels of satisfaction with the tutor were different in the three groups. All of the students were comfortable in the discussion room and IT center. These results suggested that PBL tutorials are supported by the scenario, the tutor, and the location of the group session, as well as by self-learning. Moreover, one of the most important factors for a PBL tutorial that the student is ready for the free discussions and has enough time for individual self-learning.
本文报道了在现有课程体系中,针对我校二年级学生的高级课程实施基于问题的学习(PBL)辅导教程的情况。该课程在暑假的最后5天开课,学生可自愿报名参加。学生通过随机抽样分成小组。PBL辅导教程的前3天依据我们原来的情景(基于医疗案例)处理医学问题,后2天学生利用信息技术自行展示学习成果。在整个课程中,除了与导师进行1个半小时的小组讨论外,学生需要进行自主学习。通过小组讨论出勤情况和档案袋分析进行评估。经过档案袋分析,学生确定了学习问题的数量(A组,26±7个问题;B组,20±3个问题;C组,21±7个问题)。通过问卷调查发现,84%的学生对每个情景都非常感兴趣,95%的学生对每个情景都感觉熟悉。三组学生对导师的满意度不同。所有学生在讨论室和信息技术中心都感觉很舒适。这些结果表明,PBL辅导教程得到情景、导师、小组讨论地点以及自主学习的支持。此外,对于PBL辅导教程而言,最重要的因素之一是学生要为自由讨论做好准备并有足够的时间进行个人自主学习。