• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马尼亚克鲁日县农村人口的狂犬病监测。

Rabies surveillance in the rural population of Cluj County, Romania.

作者信息

Bocsan Ioan S, Brumboiu Irina, Coman Alexandru, Tarba Ramona, Zanc Virginia, Mihaiu Marian

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Rural Remote Health. 2005 Jul-Sep;5(3):431. Epub 2005 Sep 20.

PMID:16178673
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The rabies virus causes an acute encephalomyelitis that progresses to coma and death within 10 days of the onset of the disease. Taking into account the fatality of the disease and the absence of a specific treatment, preventive methods are of the outmost importance. The purpose of this study was to assess the exposure of the rural population from Cluj County, Romania, to rabies risk factors.

METHODS

Data regarding the exposure of the rural population from Cluj County to rabies risk factors were collected from the Vaccination Center registry at the Infectious Diseases Teaching Hospital in Cluj-Napoca. The information was treated confidentially. The data obtained were collected using an Access 2000 database and was analyzed using Epi Info. Information regarding the general population was available from the 2002 General Population and Housing Census.

RESULTS

Cluj County reported 1008 cases of human exposure to potentially rabid animals between April 1998 and December 2004. The relative contributions of the major groups of aggressor animals were as follows: 882 dogs (81.55%), 51 cats (5.06%), 30 foxes (2.98%), 28 horses (2.78%), 19 rats (1.89%), and 58 other animals (5.74%). Post-exposure prophylaxis with antirabies serum immune globulin was prescribed in 9% of the cases (n = 90). Vaccine was recommended in 72% of the cases (n = 726). Two hundred and eighty-three patients out of 726 (38.98%) underwent complete vaccine prophylaxis. Diagnoses in animals suspected of having rabies were made by direct immunofluorescent antibody staining of rabies viral antigen in brain material. The number of animals that tested positive for rabies during the period April 1998 to December 2004 was 49. More than 77% (n = 38) were wild animals. The relative contributions of the major groups of animals were as follows: 33 foxes (67.35%), 7 dogs (14.29%), 2 wolves (4.08%) and 7 other animals (14.29%).

CONCLUSIONS

The fatal risk of rabies in human beings, and the persistence of the virus in this geographic area, makes legitimate the recommendation of prophylactic procedures for persons exposed to potentially rabid animals.

摘要

引言

狂犬病病毒可引发急性脑脊髓炎,疾病发作后10天内会进展至昏迷并导致死亡。鉴于该疾病的致死性以及缺乏特效治疗方法,预防措施至关重要。本研究旨在评估罗马尼亚克卢日县农村人口暴露于狂犬病危险因素的情况。

方法

从克卢日-纳波卡传染病教学医院的疫苗接种中心登记处收集有关克卢日县农村人口暴露于狂犬病危险因素的数据。这些信息得到了保密处理。所获数据使用Access 2000数据库进行收集,并使用Epi Info进行分析。关于一般人群的信息可从2002年一般人口和住房普查中获取。

结果

1998年4月至2004年12月期间,克卢日县报告了1008例人类暴露于潜在狂犬病动物的病例。主要攻击动物群体的相对占比情况如下:狗882例(81.55%)、猫51例(5.06%)、狐狸30例(2.98%)、马28例(2.78%)、大鼠19例(1.89%)以及其他动物58例(5.74%)。9%的病例(n = 90)接受了狂犬病血清免疫球蛋白的暴露后预防治疗。72%的病例(n = 726)被建议接种疫苗。726例患者中有283例(38.98%)接受了完整的疫苗预防治疗。通过对脑组织中狂犬病病毒抗原进行直接免疫荧光抗体染色,对疑似患有狂犬病的动物进行诊断。1998年4月至2004年12月期间检测出狂犬病呈阳性的动物数量为49只。超过77%(n = 38)为野生动物。主要动物群体的相对占比情况如下:狐狸33只(67.35%)、狗7只(14.29%)、狼2只(4.08%)以及其他动物7只(14.29%)。

结论

狂犬病对人类的致命风险以及该病毒在这一地理区域的持续存在,使得对暴露于潜在狂犬病动物的人群推荐预防程序具有合理性。

相似文献

1
Rabies surveillance in the rural population of Cluj County, Romania.罗马尼亚克鲁日县农村人口的狂犬病监测。
Rural Remote Health. 2005 Jul-Sep;5(3):431. Epub 2005 Sep 20.
2
An important public health problem: rabies suspected bites and post-exposure prophylaxis in a health district in Turkey.一个重要的公共卫生问题:土耳其某健康区的疑似狂犬病咬伤及暴露后预防
Int J Infect Dis. 2006 May;10(3):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.010. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
3
Urban epizootic of rabies in Mexico: epidemiology and impact of animal bite injuries.墨西哥狂犬病城市流行:动物咬伤的流行病学及影响
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):615-24.
4
Post-exposure anti-rabies prophylaxis in Lublin province (Eastern Poland) in 2004-2005.2004 - 2005年波兰东部卢布林省的暴露后狂犬病预防措施
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2006;13(2):337-40.
5
Epidemiology of rabies in skunks in Texas.德克萨斯州臭鼬狂犬病的流行病学
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Mar 1;234(5):616-20. doi: 10.2460/javma.234.5.616.
6
[Rabies in Poland in 2006].[2006年波兰的狂犬病]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2008;62(2):337-44.
7
[Rabies in Poland in 2002].[2002年波兰的狂犬病]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2004;58(1):143-52.
8
Epidemiology of animal bites and rabies cases in India. A multicentric study.印度动物咬伤及狂犬病病例的流行病学。一项多中心研究。
J Commun Dis. 2008 Mar;40(1):27-36.
9
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1997.1997年美国的狂犬病监测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998 Dec 15;213(12):1713-28.
10
[Rabies in Poland in 2007].[2007年波兰的狂犬病]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2009;63(2):257-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge of rabies among rural community in Chengalpet district, India.印度钦加尔佩特地区农村社区对狂犬病的认知情况。
Bioinformation. 2022 Mar 31;18(3):155-159. doi: 10.6026/97320630018155. eCollection 2022.