Westerståhl M, Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Jansson E
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005 Oct;15(5):287-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00420.x.
The aim of this study was to investigate physical activity levels and factors related to physical activity among 16-year-old girls and boys in secondary school practical and theoretical programs. An additional aim was to identify factors contributing to differences in physical activity patterns between the educational programs. Sixteen-year-old students in the first year of secondary school in Sweden (n=585) were systematically selected and 93% agreed to complete a questionnaire. Compared with students in theoretical programs, those in practical programs spent less time and energy per day in physical activity. Girls in practical programs were the least physically active, and boys in theoretical programs the most physically active students. Statistical analysis showed that, among students in practical programs, the influence of educational program on physical activity level was explained by lower socio-economic level, less parental support, lower perceived health level, and negative attitudes toward outdoor physical activities. These data suggest that promotion of physical activity should focus on students, especially girls, in practical programs. Because the difference in physical activity levels between educational programs was partly an effect of less positive parental influence, school-based programs may be especially influential in increasing physical activity levels among secondary school students.
本研究旨在调查瑞典中学实践课程和理论课程中16岁女孩和男孩的身体活动水平以及与身体活动相关的因素。另一个目的是确定导致不同教育课程之间身体活动模式差异的因素。我们系统地选取了瑞典中学一年级的16岁学生(n = 585),93%的学生同意填写问卷。与理论课程的学生相比,实践课程的学生每天花费在身体活动上的时间和精力较少。实践课程中的女孩身体活动最少,而理论课程中的男孩身体活动最为积极。统计分析表明,在实践课程的学生中,教育课程对身体活动水平的影响可以通过较低的社会经济水平、较少的父母支持、较低的健康认知水平以及对户外体育活动的消极态度来解释。这些数据表明,促进身体活动应关注实践课程中的学生,尤其是女孩。由于不同教育课程之间身体活动水平的差异部分是父母积极影响较少的结果,基于学校的课程可能对提高中学生的身体活动水平特别有影响力。