Krabbendam Lydia, Arts Baer, van Os Jim, Aleman André
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Schizophr Res. 2005 Dec 15;80(2-3):137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
Evidence suggests that cognitive functioning in bipolar disorder may be impaired even in euthymic states, but it is unclear if the pattern of deficits is similar to the deficits found in schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to review quantitatively the studies on cognitive performance in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Articles for consideration were identified through a literature search in MEDLINE and PsycLIT in the period between 1985 and October 2004, using the keywords "schizophrenia" combined with "bipolar disorder", or "manic-depress*" or "manic" combined with "cogniti*" or "neuropsycholog*". Thirty-one studies were included that: i) evaluated cognitive performance using standardized and reliable neuropsychological testing procedures; ii) compared adult patients with schizophrenia and with bipolar disorder; iii) reported test scores of both patient groups, or exact p-values, t-values, or F-values; and iv) were published as an original article in a peer-reviewed English language journal.
Meta-analyses of all studies indicated that patients with bipolar disorder generally perform better than patients with schizophrenia, but the distribution of effect sizes showed substantial heterogeneity. Results based on a more homogeneous subset of studies that matched patient groups on clinical and demographic characteristics pointed in the same direction, with effect sizes in the moderate range.
Patients with bipolar disorder show better cognitive performance than patients with schizophrenia, even when matched for clinical and demographic characteristics.
有证据表明,双相情感障碍患者即使处于心境正常状态,其认知功能也可能受损,但尚不清楚这种缺陷模式是否与精神分裂症患者的缺陷相似。本研究旨在对有关精神分裂症和双相情感障碍认知表现的研究进行定量综述。
通过在1985年至2004年10月期间检索MEDLINE和PsycLIT数据库来确定纳入考虑的文章,使用的关键词为“精神分裂症”与“双相情感障碍”组合,或“躁狂抑郁*”或“躁狂”与“认知*”或“神经心理学*”组合。纳入了31项研究,这些研究:i)使用标准化且可靠的神经心理学测试程序评估认知表现;ii)比较成年精神分裂症患者和双相情感障碍患者;iii)报告了两组患者的测试分数,或确切的p值、t值或F值;iv)作为原创文章发表在同行评审的英文期刊上。
对所有研究的荟萃分析表明,双相情感障碍患者的总体表现通常优于精神分裂症患者,但效应量的分布显示出很大的异质性。基于在临床和人口统计学特征上匹配患者组的更同质研究子集的结果也指向相同方向,效应量处于中等范围。
即使在临床和人口统计学特征相匹配的情况下,双相情感障碍患者的认知表现也优于精神分裂症患者。