Guatelli-Steinberg Debbie, Reid Donald J, Bishop Thomas A, Larsen Clark Spencer
Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 4;102(40):14197-202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503108102. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
A longstanding controversy in paleoanthropology surrounds the question of whether Neandertals shared the prolonged growth periods of modern humans. To address this question, this investigation compares the duration of enamel formation in Neandertals with that of three comparative modern human groups. Because dental and somatic growth are correlated with each other, dental growth periods are indicative of overall periods of growth. Growth increments on the anterior teeth of Neandertals, modern Inuit, and modern people from Newcastle and southern Africa were counted and their means compared. In addition, potential variation in the time spans represented by growth increments was considered and incorporated into the analysis of enamel formation times. These analyses show that Neandertal imbricational enamel formation times, although likely to have been faster than those of the Inuit, are not likely to have been faster than those of the Newcastle sample and for some teeth are clearly slower than those of the southern African sample. Thus, Neandertal tooth growth and, by extension, somatic growth, appears to be encompassed within the modern human range of interpopulation variation.
古人类学中一个长期存在的争议围绕着尼安德特人是否与现代人类有相同的长期生长阶段这一问题。为了解决这个问题,本研究将尼安德特人的牙釉质形成持续时间与三个现代人类对比群体的进行了比较。由于牙齿生长和身体生长相互关联,牙齿生长阶段可指示整体生长阶段。对尼安德特人、现代因纽特人、来自纽卡斯尔的现代人和南非人的前牙生长增量进行了计数,并比较了它们的平均值。此外,还考虑了生长增量所代表的时间跨度的潜在差异,并将其纳入牙釉质形成时间的分析中。这些分析表明,尼安德特人叠瓦状牙釉质的形成时间,虽然可能比因纽特人快,但不太可能比纽卡斯尔样本快,而且某些牙齿明显比南非样本慢。因此,尼安德特人的牙齿生长,进而身体生长,似乎处于现代人类群体间变异范围内。