Stavrou Efty P, Wood Joanne M
School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Oct;83(5):574-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00527.x.
To evaluate the efficacy of flicker perimetry compared with that of static perimetry in determining central visual field losses in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Flicker and static perimetry were performed using the Medmont field analyser on 20 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 24 age-matched control participants.
Flicker, but not static, perimetry demonstrated significant reductions in thresholds in those participants who had a recent diagnosis of diabetes or who had no or only minimal diabetic retinopathy compared to the control group at eccentricities close to fixation.
Flicker perimetry is recommended for the evaluation of visual field losses in participants with recent onset of diabetes and minimal diabetic retinopathy.
评估与静态视野检查相比,闪烁视野检查在确定2型糖尿病患者中心视野缺损方面的疗效。
使用Medmont视野分析仪对20名2型糖尿病患者和24名年龄匹配的对照参与者进行闪烁和静态视野检查。
与对照组相比,对于近期诊断为糖尿病或无糖尿病视网膜病变或仅有轻微糖尿病视网膜病变的参与者,在靠近注视点的偏心度处,闪烁视野检查(而非静态视野检查)显示阈值有显著降低。
建议使用闪烁视野检查来评估近期发病且糖尿病视网膜病变轻微的参与者的视野缺损情况。