Spokas K, Bogner J, Chanton J P, Morcet M, Aran C, Graff C, Golvan Y Moreau-Le, Hebe I
University of Minnesota, Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, St. Paul, USA.
Waste Manag. 2006;26(5):516-25. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.07.021. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
Many developed countries have targeted landfill methane recovery among greenhouse gas mitigation strategies, since methane is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Major questions remain with respect to actual methane production rates in field settings and the relative mass of methane that is recovered, emitted, oxidized by methanotrophic bacteria, laterally migrated, or temporarily stored within the landfill volume. This paper presents the results of extensive field campaigns at three landfill sites to elucidate the total methane balance and provide field measurements to quantify these pathways. We assessed the overall methane mass balance in field cells with a variety of designs, cover materials, and gas management strategies. Sites included different cell configurations, including temporary clay cover, final clay cover, geosynthetic clay liners, and geomembrane composite covers, and cells with and without gas collection systems. Methane emission rates ranged from -2.2 to >10,000 mg CH(4) m(-2) d(-1). Total methane oxidation rates ranged from 4% to 50% of the methane flux through the cover at sites with positive emissions. Oxidation of atmospheric methane was occurring in vegetated soils above a geomembrane. The results of these studies were used as the basis for guidelines by the French environment agency (ADEME) for default values for percent recovery: 35% for an operating cell with an active landfill gas (LFG) recovery system, 65% for a temporary covered cell with an active LFG recovery system, 85% for a cell with clay final cover and active LFG recovery, and 90% for a cell with a geomembrane final cover and active LFG recovery.
由于甲烷是仅次于二氧化碳的第二重要温室气体,许多发达国家已将垃圾填埋场甲烷回收作为温室气体减排战略的目标。关于实地环境中实际的甲烷产生速率以及回收、排放、被甲烷氧化细菌氧化、横向迁移或暂时存储在垃圾填埋场中的甲烷相对质量,仍存在重大问题。本文介绍了在三个垃圾填埋场进行的广泛实地监测活动的结果,以阐明甲烷的总平衡,并提供实地测量数据来量化这些途径。我们评估了具有各种设计、覆盖材料和气体管理策略的实地单元中的总体甲烷质量平衡。这些场地包括不同的单元配置,包括临时粘土覆盖、最终粘土覆盖、土工合成粘土衬垫和土工膜复合覆盖,以及有和没有气体收集系统的单元。甲烷排放速率范围为-2.2至>10,000 mg CH(4) m(-2) d(-1)。在有正排放的场地,甲烷总氧化速率范围为通过覆盖层的甲烷通量的4%至50%。在土工膜上方的植被土壤中发生了大气甲烷的氧化。这些研究结果被法国环境机构(ADEME)用作回收率默认值指南的基础:对于配备有活性垃圾填埋气(LFG)回收系统的运行单元,回收率为35%;对于配备有活性LFG回收系统的临时覆盖单元,回收率为65%;对于有粘土最终覆盖和活性LFG回收的单元,回收率为85%;对于有土工膜最终覆盖和活性LFG回收的单元,回收率为90%。