Suppr超能文献

流感疫苗在老年人中的有效性和效果:一项系统评价

Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in elderly people: a systematic review.

作者信息

Jefferson T, Rivetti D, Rivetti A, Rudin M, Di Pietrantonj C, Demicheli V

机构信息

Cochrane Vaccines Field, ASL 20, 15100 Alessandria, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet. 2005 Oct 1;366(9492):1165-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67339-4. Epub 2005 Sep 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccination of elderly individuals is recommended worldwide. Our aim was to review the evidence of efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in individuals aged 65 years or older.

METHODS

We searched five electronic databases to December, 2004, in any language, for randomised (n=5), cohort (n=49), and case-control (n=10) studies, assessing efficacy against influenza (reduction in laboratory-confirmed cases) or effectiveness against influenza-like illness (reduction in symptomatic cases). We expressed vaccine efficacy or effectiveness as a proportion, using the formula VE=1-relative risk (RR) or VE*=1-odds ratio (OR). We analysed the following outcomes: influenza, influenza-like illness, hospital admissions, complications, and deaths.

FINDINGS

In homes for elderly individuals (with good vaccine match and high viral circulation) the effectiveness of vaccines against influenza-like illness was 23% (95% CI 6-36) and non-significant against influenza (RR 1.04, 0.43-2.51). Well matched vaccines prevented pneumonia (VE 46%, 30-58) and hospital admission (VE 45%, 16-64) for and deaths from influenza or pneumonia (VE 42%, 17-59), and reduced all-cause mortality (VE 60%, 23-79). In elderly individuals living in the community, vaccines were not significantly effective against influenza (RR 0.19, 0.02-2.01), influenza-like illness (RR 1.05, 0.58-1.89), or pneumonia (RR 0.88, 0.64-1.20). Well matched vaccines prevented hospital admission for influenza and pneumonia (VE 26%, 12-38) and all-cause mortality (VE 42%, 24-55). After adjustment for confounders, vaccine performance was improved for admissions to hospital for influenza or pneumonia (VE* 27%, 21-33), respiratory diseases (VE* 22%, 15-28), and cardiac disease (VE* 24%, 18-30), and for all-cause mortality (VE* 47%, 39-54).

INTERPRETATION

In long-term care facilities, where vaccination is most effective against complications, the aims of the vaccination campaign are fulfilled, at least in part. However, according to reliable evidence the usefulness of vaccines in the community is modest.

摘要

背景

全球都建议对老年人进行流感疫苗接种。我们的目的是回顾65岁及以上人群中流感疫苗有效性和效果的证据。

方法

我们检索了五个电子数据库,截至2004年12月,不限语言,查找随机对照试验(n = 5)、队列研究(n = 49)和病例对照研究(n = 10),评估疫苗对流感的效力(实验室确诊病例的减少)或对流感样疾病的效果(有症状病例的减少)。我们使用公式VE = 1 - 相对危险度(RR)或VE* = 1 - 比值比(OR)将疫苗效力或效果表示为一个比例。我们分析了以下结果:流感、流感样疾病、住院、并发症和死亡。

结果

在养老院(疫苗匹配良好且病毒传播率高),疫苗对流感样疾病的效果为23%(95%CI 6 - 36),对流感无显著效果(RR 1.04,0.43 - 2.51)。匹配良好的疫苗可预防肺炎(VE 46%,30 - 58)、因流感或肺炎住院(VE 45%,16 - 64)以及流感或肺炎导致的死亡(VE 42%,17 - 59),并降低全因死亡率(VE 60%,23 - 79)。在社区居住的老年人中,疫苗对流感(RR 0.19,0.02 - 2.01)、流感样疾病(RR 1.05,0.58 - 1.89)或肺炎(RR 0.88,0.64 - 1.20)无显著效果。匹配良好的疫苗可预防因流感和肺炎住院(VE 26%,12 - 38)以及全因死亡率(VE 42%,24 - 55)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,疫苗对因流感或肺炎住院(VE* 27%,21 - 33)、呼吸系统疾病(VE* 22%,15 - 28)和心脏病(VE* 24%,18 - 30)以及全因死亡率(VE* 47%,39 - 54)的效果有所改善。

解读

在长期护理机构中,接种疫苗对预防并发症最为有效,至少部分实现了疫苗接种活动的目标。然而,根据可靠证据,疫苗在社区中的作用有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验