Moon Rachel Y, Sprague Bruce M, Patel Kantilal M
Division of General Pediatrics and Community Health, Goldberg Center for Community Pediatric Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):972-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0924.
A total of 20% of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases in the 1990s occurred in child care settings. This is much higher than the 8% expected from Census Bureau data. Factors that were associated with child care SIDS included older age; white race; older, more educated mothers; and unaccustomed prone position. Since these findings, much emphasis has been placed on promoting a safe sleep environment in child care. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of SIDS occurring in child care in 2001 and to assess risk factors for SIDS in child care.
We conducted a retrospective review of all SIDS deaths that occurred in 2001 in 13 US states. Information regarding demographics, SIDS risk factors, and child care arrangements were collected and analyzed. Deaths that occurred in child care were compared with deaths that occurred during parental care.
Of 480 deaths, 79 (16.5%) occurred in child care settings. Of these child care deaths, 36.7% occurred in family child care homes, 17.7% occurred in child care centers, 21.3% occurred in relative care, and 17.7% occurred with a nanny/babysitter at home. Infants in child care were more likely to be older and to die between the hours of 8 am and 4 pm and less likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke. There was no difference in usual, found, or placed sleep position between child care and home deaths. Approximately one half of the infants who died of SIDS in both settings were found prone, and 20% of deaths in both settings were among infants who were unaccustomed to prone sleep.
The proportion of SIDS deaths in child care has declined slightly but still remains high at 16.5%. Infants in child care are no more likely to be placed or found prone and no more likely to be on an unsafe sleep surface. Educational efforts with child care providers have been effective and should be expanded to unregulated child care providers. In addition, there may be other, yet-unidentified factors in child care that place infants in those settings at higher risk for SIDS.
20世纪90年代,共有20%的婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)病例发生在儿童保育机构。这一比例远高于美国人口普查局数据预期的8%。与儿童保育机构中婴儿猝死综合征相关的因素包括年龄较大;白人种族;母亲年龄较大、受教育程度较高;以及不习惯俯卧姿势。自这些研究结果公布以来,人们一直非常重视在儿童保育机构中推广安全的睡眠环境。本研究的目的是确定2001年发生在儿童保育机构中的婴儿猝死综合征比例,并评估儿童保育机构中婴儿猝死综合征的风险因素。
我们对2001年在美国13个州发生的所有婴儿猝死综合征死亡病例进行了回顾性研究。收集并分析了有关人口统计学、婴儿猝死综合征风险因素和儿童保育安排的信息。将发生在儿童保育机构中的死亡病例与父母照料期间发生的死亡病例进行比较。
在480例死亡病例中,79例(16.5%)发生在儿童保育机构。在这些儿童保育机构死亡病例中,36.7%发生在家庭式儿童保育中心,17.7%发生在儿童保育中心,21.3%发生在亲属照料中,17.7%发生在家中有保姆照顾的情况下。在儿童保育机构中的婴儿年龄往往较大,且更有可能在上午8点至下午4点之间死亡,接触二手烟的可能性较小。儿童保育机构死亡病例与家中死亡病例在通常的、被发现的或放置的睡眠姿势方面没有差异。在这两种情况下,约有一半死于婴儿猝死综合征的婴儿被发现为俯卧姿势,且在这两种情况下,20%的死亡病例发生在不习惯俯卧睡眠的婴儿中。
儿童保育机构中婴儿猝死综合征死亡病例的比例略有下降,但仍高达16.5%。在儿童保育机构中的婴儿被放置或被发现为俯卧姿势的可能性并不更高,睡在不安全睡眠表面的可能性也不更高。对儿童保育机构提供者的教育工作已经取得成效,应扩大到不受监管的儿童保育机构提供者。此外,儿童保育机构中可能还存在其他尚未确定的因素,使处于这些环境中的婴儿患婴儿猝死综合征的风险更高。