The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):731-737. doi: 10.1177/10775587211053410. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Our goal was to learn about monitoring and enforcement of state assisted living (AL) regulations. Using survey responses provided in 2019 from administrative agents across 48 states, we described state agency structures, accounted for operational processes concerning monitoring and enforcement, and documented data collecting and public reporting efforts. In half of the states, oversight of AL was dispersed across three or more agencies, and administrative support varied in terms of staffing and budget allocations. Operations also varied. While most agents could deploy a range of monitoring and enforcement tools, less than half compiled data concerning inspections, violations, and penalties. Less than 10 states shared such information in a manner that was easily accessible to the public. Future research should determine how these varied administrative structures and processes deter or contribute to AL communities' efforts to implement regulations designed to promote quality of life and provide for the safety of residents.
我们的目标是了解州立辅助生活(AL)法规的监测和执行情况。我们使用了 2019 年来自 48 个州的行政代理机构提供的调查回复,描述了州机构结构,说明了与监测和执行相关的运作过程,并记录了数据收集和公共报告工作。在一半的州,AL 的监督分散在三个或更多的机构中,行政支持在人员配备和预算分配方面存在差异。运作也各不相同。虽然大多数代理机构都可以部署一系列监测和执行工具,但只有不到一半的机构收集有关检查、违规和处罚的数据。不到 10 个州以公众易于访问的方式共享此类信息。未来的研究应该确定这些不同的行政结构和流程是如何阻止或促进 AL 社区努力实施旨在提高生活质量和保障居民安全的法规。