• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国基于初级保健的疾病管理项目是否具有生存获益?

Is there a survival benefit within a German primary care-based disease management program?

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):49-54.

PMID:20148605
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the mortality rate of patients with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in the German diabetes disease management program (DMP) with the mortality rate of those who were not enrolled.

STUDY DESIGN

This observational study was part of the ELSID study (Evaluation of a Large Scale Implementation of disease management programs) in Germany.

METHODS

Participants had type 2 diabetes and were either enrolled or not enrolled in the DMP. The DMP provides systems-based, multifaceted, and patient-centered interventions. To reduce imbalances between the groups, a matched sample was created using sex, age, retirement status, federal state, pharmacy-based cost groups, and diagnostic-cost groups as matching criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to assess overall mortality. The observation period was 3 years beginning on January 1, 2006.

RESULTS

A total of 11,079 patients were included in the analysis. As of January 1, 2006, 2300 patients were enrolled in the DMP and 8779 were receiving routine care. There were 1927 matched pairs of patients in the DMP group and the non-DMP group. The overall mortality rate was 11.3% in the DMP and 14.4% in the non-DMP group (log-rank test P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between participation in the German diabetes DMP and reduced mortality. This reduced mortality cannot be attributed directly to the DMP. However, further research should evaluate whether a primary care-based DMP contributes to increased life expectancy in patients with diabetes.

摘要

目的

比较参加德国糖尿病疾病管理计划(DMP)的 2 型糖尿病患者的死亡率与未参加该计划的患者的死亡率。

研究设计

这是德国 ELSID 研究(评估疾病管理计划的大规模实施情况)的一部分。

方法

参与者患有 2 型糖尿病,他们要么参加了 DMP,要么没有参加。DMP 提供基于系统的、多方面的、以患者为中心的干预措施。为了减少两组之间的不平衡,使用性别、年龄、退休状态、联邦州、基于药房的费用组和诊断费用组作为匹配标准创建了匹配样本。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型和 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估总体死亡率。观察期从 2006 年 1 月 1 日开始,为期 3 年。

结果

共纳入 11079 名患者进行分析。截至 2006 年 1 月 1 日,2300 名患者参加了 DMP,8779 名患者接受了常规护理。DMP 组和非 DMP 组有 1927 对匹配患者。DMP 组和非 DMP 组的总体死亡率分别为 11.3%和 14.4%(对数秩检验 P<.01)。

结论

我们发现参加德国糖尿病 DMP 与死亡率降低之间存在关联。这种死亡率的降低不能直接归因于 DMP。然而,进一步的研究应该评估以初级保健为基础的 DMP 是否有助于延长糖尿病患者的预期寿命。

相似文献

1
Is there a survival benefit within a German primary care-based disease management program?德国基于初级保健的疾病管理项目是否具有生存获益?
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):49-54.
2
ELSID-Diabetes study-evaluation of a large scale implementation of disease management programmes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Rationale, design and conduct--a study protocol [ISRCTN08471887].ELSID-糖尿病研究——对2型糖尿病患者疾病管理项目大规模实施情况的评估。原理、设计与实施——一项研究方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN08471887]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 4;5:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-99.
3
German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument.德国糖尿病疾病管理项目适用于根据慢性病护理模式进行护理重组:使用慢性病护理患者评估工具进行的一项评估
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jun;31(6):1150-4. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2104. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
4
[Gender-specific differences in quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes with or without participating in DMP].2型糖尿病患者(无论是否参与糖尿病管理项目)生活质量的性别差异
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Apr;70(4):250-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077057.
5
[Evaluating the effectiveness of a disease management program diabetes in the German Statutory Health Insurance: first results and methodological considerations].[评估德国法定医疗保险中糖尿病疾病管理项目的有效性:初步结果与方法学考量]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(9):649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
[Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary health care and outpatient community settings].[改善初级卫生保健和门诊社区环境中糖尿病管理的干预措施]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jan 28;164(5):607-9.
7
Patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from primary care-based disease management: a propensity score matched survival time analysis.2 型糖尿病患者从基于初级保健的疾病管理中获益:倾向评分匹配生存时间分析。
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Aug;15(4):241-7. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0063. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
8
[General practitioners' opinion and attitude towards DMPs and the change in practice routines to implement the DMP "diabetes mellitus type 2"].[全科医生对糖尿病管理计划的看法和态度以及实施“2型糖尿病”糖尿病管理计划的实践流程变化]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(6):427-33. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.06.026. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
9
Short-term effects of an educational program on health-seeking behavior for infections in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled intervention trial in primary care.一项教育项目对2型糖尿病患者感染就医行为的短期影响:一项初级保健中的随机对照干预试验
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):402-7. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0744. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
10
Disease management programmes for patients with coronary heart disease--an empirical study of German programmes.冠心病患者的疾病管理项目——对德国项目的实证研究
Health Policy. 2008 Dec;88(2-3):176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality and Hospitalizations Among Patients Enrolled in an Interprofessional Medication Management Program.参与跨专业药物管理项目的患者的死亡率和住院率。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Apr 14;120(15):253-260. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0014.
2
The use of routine data from primary care practices in Germany to analyze the impact of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization of primary care services for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.利用德国初级保健实践中的常规数据来分析 SARS-CoV-2 爆发对 2 型糖尿病患者初级保健服务利用的影响。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Dec 16;23(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01945-y.
3
Effectiveness of the German disease management programs: quasi-experimental analyses assessing the population-level health impact.
德国疾病管理项目的效果:评估人群健康影响的准实验分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):2092. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12050-7.
4
Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care-an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany.德国基层医疗中疾病管理项目的态度与经验——对全科医生的探索性调查
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Oct;171(13-14):310-320. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00867-1. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
Diabetes pay-for-performance program can reduce all-cause mortality in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.糖尿病绩效付费项目可降低新诊断2型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(7):e19139. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019139.
6
Study protocol for a quasi-experimental claims-based study evaluating 10-year results of the population-based integrated healthcare model 'Gesundes Kinzigtal' (Healthy Kinzigtal): the INTEGRAL study.基于人群的综合医疗模式“健康金齐希塔尔”(Gesundes Kinzigtal)的 10 年结果的准实验基于索赔的研究方案:INTEGRAL 研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):e025945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025945.
7
Risk of Microvascular Complications and Macrovascular Risk Factors in Early-Onset Type 1 Diabetes after at Least 10 Years Duration: An Analysis of Three Population-Based Cross-Sectional Surveys in Germany between 2009 and 2016.病程至少10年的早发型1型糖尿病患者微血管并发症风险及大血管危险因素:对2009年至2016年间德国三项基于人群的横断面调查的分析
Int J Endocrinol. 2018 Apr 1;2018:7806980. doi: 10.1155/2018/7806980. eCollection 2018.
8
Disease management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a longitudinal population-based descriptive study.德国2型糖尿病患者的疾病管理项目:一项基于人群的纵向描述性研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 May 18;9:37. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0236-y. eCollection 2017.
9
Impact of diabetes on outcome in critical limb ischemia with tissue loss: a large-scaled routine data analysis.糖尿病对伴有组织缺损的严重肢体缺血患者预后的影响:一项大规模常规数据分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Apr 4;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0524-8.
10
Risk of Nonfatal Stroke in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Between Disease Management Programs and Standard Care.2型糖尿病患者非致死性中风的风险:疾病管理项目与标准护理的回顾性比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jul;11(4):808-813. doi: 10.1177/1932296817691304. Epub 2017 Feb 9.