Suppr超能文献

灾害中的心理与社会健康:关联定性社会科学研究与《斯phere标准》

Mental and social health in disasters: relating qualitative social science research and the Sphere standard.

作者信息

Batniji Rajaie, Van Ommeren Mark, Saraceno Benedetto

机构信息

World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(8):1853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.050. Epub 2005 Oct 3.

Abstract

Increasingly, social scientists interested in mental and social health conduct qualitative research to chronicle the experiences of and humanitarian responses to disaster We reviewed the qualitative social science research literature in relation to a significant policy document, the Sphere Handbook, which includes a minimum standard in disaster response addressing "mental and social aspects of health", involving 12 interventions indicators. The reviewed literature in general supports the relevance of the Sphere social health intervention indicators. However, social scientists' chronicles of the diversity and complexity of communities and responses to disaster illustrate that these social interventions cannot be assumed helpful in all settings and times. With respect to Sphere mental health intervention indicators, the research largely ignores the existence and well-being of persons with pre-existing, severe mental disorders in disasters, whose well-being is addressed by the relevant Sphere standard. Instead, many social scientists focus on and question the relevance of posttraumatic stress disorder-focused interventions, which are common after some disasters and which are not specifically covered by the Sphere standard. Overall, social scientists appear to call for a social response that more actively engages the political, social, and economic causes of suffering, and that recognizes the social complexities and flux that accompany disaster. By relating social science research to the Sphere standard for mental and social health, this review informs and illustrates the standard and identifies areas of needed research.

摘要

对心理和社会健康感兴趣的社会科学家越来越多地开展定性研究,以记录灾难经历及人道主义应对措施。我们结合一份重要政策文件《斯phere手册》回顾了定性社会科学研究文献,该手册包含灾难应对中针对“健康的心理和社会层面”的最低标准,涉及12项干预指标。所回顾的文献总体上支持《斯phere》社会健康干预指标的相关性。然而,社会科学家对社区多样性和复杂性以及灾难应对措施的记录表明,不能认为这些社会干预措施在所有情况下和所有时候都有帮助。关于《斯phere》心理健康干预指标,研究很大程度上忽视了灾难中已有严重精神障碍者的存在和福祉,而《斯phere》相关标准涉及了他们的福祉。相反,许多社会科学家关注并质疑以创伤后应激障碍为重点的干预措施的相关性,这些措施在一些灾难后很常见,且《斯phere》标准并未特别涵盖。总体而言,社会科学家似乎呼吁做出一种社会回应,更积极地应对苦难的政治、社会和经济根源,并认识到灾难所伴随的社会复杂性和变化。通过将社会科学研究与《斯phere》心理和社会健康标准相关联,本综述为该标准提供了信息并加以阐释,同时确定了需要研究的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验