Henderson Silja E K, Elsass Peter, Berliner Peter
Consultant, Frederiksberg Municipality, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Professor of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Disasters. 2016 Jul;40(3):432-51. doi: 10.1111/disa.12159. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
The primary objective of this paper is to examine and inform the mental health and psychosocial support standards of the 2011 edition of the Sphere Project's Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. This is done through a qualitative analysis of internal evaluation documents, reflecting four long-term humanitarian psychosocial programmes in different countries in post-tsunami Asia. The analysis yielded three overall conclusions. First, the Sphere standards on mental health and psychosocial support generally are highly relevant to long-term psychosocial interventions after disasters such as the Indian Ocean tsunami of 26 December 2004, and their application in such settings may improve the quality of the response. Second, some of the standards in the current Sphere handbook may lack sufficient guidance to ensure the quality of humanitarian response required. Third, the long-term intervention approach poses specific challenges to programming, a problem that could be addressed by including additional guidance in the publication.
本文的主要目标是审视并为《斯phere项目人道主义宪章及人道主义应对最低标准》2011年版中的心理健康和社会心理支持标准提供信息。这是通过对内部评估文件进行定性分析来实现的,这些文件反映了亚洲海啸灾后不同国家的四个长期人道主义社会心理项目。分析得出了三个总体结论。第一,斯phere关于心理健康和社会心理支持的标准总体上与2004年12月26日印度洋海啸等灾难后的长期社会心理干预高度相关,在这种情况下应用这些标准可能会提高应对的质量。第二,当前斯phere手册中的一些标准可能缺乏足够的指导,以确保所需的人道主义应对质量。第三,长期干预方法给项目规划带来了特定挑战,这一问题可通过在出版物中纳入更多指导来解决。