Vogt Liffert, Navis Gerjan, Köster Jürgen, Manolis Athanasios J, Reid John L, de Zeeuw Dick
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Hypertens. 2005 Nov;23(11):2055-61. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000186829.56372.04.
To examine the effect of telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide on the control of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) unselected for albuminuria in a pre-planned substudy of a large, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.
The Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Micardis in Isolated Systolic hypertension (ARAMIS) study compared the antihypertensive efficacy after 6 weeks of once-daily fixed doses of telmisartan 20, 40 or 80 mg versus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or placebo in patients (n = 1039, aged 35-84 years) with ISH (seated blood pressure 150-179/< 90 mmHg). The prospective substudy analysed UAE using spot morning samples.
Urinary albumin (> 2.2-901.6 mg/l) was detected at baseline in 614 out of 918 patients who were included in the substudy analysis. In the telmisartan group (n = 354, all doses combined), a median reduction in UAE from a baseline of 14.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3, 21.8] was observed versus 1.1% (95% CI -13.5 to 16.0) and 2.7% (95% CI -0.9 to 19.9) in the hydrochlorothiazide (n = 140) and placebo (n = 120) groups, respectively. The difference between telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide was significant (P = 0.017). Reductions in UAE with telmisartan were observed in patients with baseline normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria. Telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide produced comparable reductions in systolic blood pressure in these patients.
In patients with ISH unselected for baseline albuminuria, telmisartan 20-80 mg after 6 weeks' treatment afforded significantly greater lowering of UAE than hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, irrespective of the baseline UAE, and despite comparable reductions in systolic blood pressure with both drugs.
在一项大型、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究的预先计划的亚组研究中,研究替米沙坦或氢氯噻嗪对未因蛋白尿而入选的单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)患者尿白蛋白排泄(UAE)控制的影响。
单纯收缩期高血压中血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂美卡素(ARAMIS)研究比较了每日一次固定剂量20、40或80mg替米沙坦与12.5mg氢氯噻嗪或安慰剂治疗6周后,对ISH患者(n = 1039,年龄35 - 84岁,坐位血压150 - 179/< 90 mmHg)的降压疗效。前瞻性亚组研究使用清晨即时样本分析UAE。
在纳入亚组分析的918例患者中,614例在基线时检测到尿白蛋白(> 2.2 - 901.6mg/l)。在替米沙坦组(n = 354,所有剂量合并),观察到UAE较基线水平中位数降低14.1% [95%置信区间(CI)7.3,21.8],而氢氯噻嗪组(n = 140)和安慰剂组(n = 120)分别为1.1%(95% CI -13.5至16.0)和2.7%(95% CI -0.9至19.9)。替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪之间的差异有统计学意义(P = 0.017)。在基线正常白蛋白尿、微量白蛋白尿或大量白蛋白尿的患者中均观察到替米沙坦使UAE降低。在这些患者中,替米沙坦和氢氯噻嗪使收缩压降低的幅度相当。
在未因基线蛋白尿而入选的ISH患者中,治疗6周后,20 - 80mg替米沙坦降低UAE的幅度显著大于12.5mg氢氯噻嗪;无论基线UAE水平如何,且尽管两种药物降低收缩压的幅度相当。