Greve Burkhard, Beller Constanze, Cassens Uwe, Sibrowski Walter, Göhde Wolfgang
Department of Radiobiology, University Hospital Münster, Robert Koch Strasse 43, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
Stem Cells. 2006 Mar;24(3):793-9. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0269. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
Since preanalytic lysing of erythrocytes remains critical in flow cytometry, we investigated the influence of four lysing procedures on the quantification of leukocyte and CD34+ cells in hematopoietic cell transplants (HCTs). Samples were derived from stem cell-enriched mobilized whole blood collected by apheresis (unselected) and immunologically purified stem cell products (selected) and were measured using the dual-platform (2-PF) method with two flow cytometric systems. Additionally, cells were measured by a volume-based technique (single platform [1-PF]). Results were identical in the 2-PF mode (unselected HCTs, r = 0.998; selected HCTs, r = 0.999). In comparison with the 2-PF results, the single-platform (1-PF) measurements revealed a mean decrease of 59.5% for CD34+ cells (50.8% for CD45+ cells) in unselected HCTs and a mean decrease of 52% for CD34+ cells (49.8% for CD45+ cells) in selected HCTs. In order to check the accuracy of cell quantification using the 1-PF method, leukocyte reference values from hematology counter results were compared with flow cytometric (1-PF)-counted nucleated cells. That analysis revealed good congruency, with r = 0.998 for unselected HCTs and r = 0.999 for selected HCTs. In conclusion, all lysing procedures that we used induced substantial loss of leukocytes and CD34+ cells. As demonstrated by the high accuracy of the 1-PF technique, all erythrocyte lysing procedures caused significant cell loss, which led to inconsistent counting of CD34+ cells in nonvolumetric flow cytometric (2-PF) protocols.
由于红细胞的分析前裂解在流式细胞术中仍然至关重要,我们研究了四种裂解程序对造血细胞移植(HCT)中白细胞和CD34+细胞定量的影响。样本取自通过单采术收集的富含干细胞的动员全血(未分选)和免疫纯化的干细胞产品(已分选),并使用双平台(2-PF)方法通过两种流式细胞术系统进行测量。此外,通过基于体积的技术(单平台[1-PF])对细胞进行测量。在2-PF模式下结果相同(未分选的HCT,r = 0.998;已分选的HCT,r = 0.999)。与2-PF结果相比,单平台(1-PF)测量显示,未分选的HCT中CD34+细胞平均减少59.5%(CD45+细胞减少50.8%),已分选的HCT中CD34+细胞平均减少52%(CD45+细胞减少49.8%)。为了检查使用1-PF方法进行细胞定量的准确性,将血液学计数器结果中的白细胞参考值与流式细胞术(1-PF)计数的有核细胞进行比较。该分析显示一致性良好,未分选的HCT中r = 0.998,已分选的HCT中r = 0.999。总之,我们使用的所有裂解程序都会导致白细胞和CD34+细胞大量损失。如1-PF技术的高准确性所示,所有红细胞裂解程序都会导致显著的细胞损失,这导致在非体积流式细胞术(2-PF)方案中CD34+细胞计数不一致。