Iedema Roderick Aren Michael, Jorm Christine, Long Debbi, Braithwaite Jeffrey, Travaglia Jo, Westbrook Mary
The University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(7):1605-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.049. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
In this paper, we discuss how a technique borrowed from defense and manufacturing is being deployed in hospitals across the industrialized world to investigate clinical errors. We open with a discussion of the levers used by policy makers to mandate that clinicians not just report errors, but also gather to investigate those errors using root cause analysis (RCA). We focus on the tensions created for clinicians as they are expected to formulate 'systems solutions' that go beyond blame. In addressing these matters, we present a discourse analysis of data derived during an evaluation of the NSW Health Safety Improvement Program. Data include transcripts of RCA meetings which were recorded in a local metropolitan teaching hospital. From this analysis we move back to the argument that RCA involves clinicians in 'immaterial labour', or the production of communication and information, and that this new labour realizes two important developments. First, because RCA is anchored in the principle of health care practitioners not just scrutinizing each other, but scrutinizing each others'errors, RCA is a challenging task. Second, thanks to turning the clinical gaze in on the clinical observer, RCA engenders a new level of reflexivity of clinical self and of clinical practice. We conclude with asking whether this reflexivity will lock the clinical gaze into a micro-sociology of error, or whether it will enable this gaze to influence matters superordinate to the specifics of practice and the design of clinical treatments; that is, the over-arching governance and structuring of hospital care.
在本文中,我们探讨了一种从国防和制造业借鉴而来的技术如何在工业化世界的医院中得到应用,以调查临床失误。我们首先讨论政策制定者用来强制临床医生不仅要报告失误,还要聚集起来使用根本原因分析(RCA)来调查这些失误的手段。我们关注临床医生在被期望制定超越指责的“系统解决方案”时所面临的紧张关系。在讨论这些问题时,我们对新南威尔士州健康安全改进计划评估期间得出的数据进行了话语分析。数据包括在一家当地大都市教学医院记录的RCA会议的文字记录。通过这种分析,我们回到这样一个观点,即RCA让临床医生参与“非物质劳动”,也就是沟通和信息的生产,并且这种新劳动实现了两个重要发展。首先,由于RCA基于医疗从业者不仅要相互审查,还要审查彼此失误的原则,所以RCA是一项具有挑战性的任务。其次,由于将临床目光转向临床观察者,RCA产生了临床自我和临床实践的新反思层次。我们最后提出疑问,这种反思会将临床目光锁定在失误的微观社会学中,还是会使这种目光能够影响超越实践细节和临床治疗设计的事项;也就是说,医院护理的总体治理和结构。