Joyce Carrie, Rossion Bruno
Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;116(11):2613-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.005. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
(1) To investigate the hypothesis that the vertex positive potential (VPP) and the N170 ERP components reported in the face processing literature are two manifestations of the same brain processes whose relative amplitude in a given experiment is dependent on reference electrode; (2) to investigate whether differences in face/object results reported in studies looking at the VPP and N170 are attributable to the location of reference.
EEG was recorded from 53 scalp electrodes referenced online to the left mastoid while subjects viewed face, car and word stimuli. Off-line, the data were systematically re-referenced to the common average, averaged mastoids, averaged earlobes, non-cephalic, and nose. The correlation of timing, amplitude, and effects was investigated across reference electrodes.
(1) The amplitude of the N170 and VPP components varies in a precisely inverse manner across reference; (2) the peaks of the N170 and VPP are temporally coincident for all reference electrodes, (3) both components can be accounted for by the same dipolar configuration, and (4) the components show identical functional properties.
The VPP and N170 are two 'faces' of the same brain generators.
The differential N170/VPP effects observed in ERP studies can be accounted for by differences in reference methodology.
(1)研究如下假设,即面部加工文献中报道的顶点正电位(VPP)和N170事件相关电位(ERP)成分是同一脑过程的两种表现形式,在给定实验中其相对幅值取决于参考电极;(2)研究在观察VPP和N170的研究中所报道的面部/物体结果差异是否归因于参考位置。
当受试者观看面部、汽车和单词刺激时,从53个头皮电极记录脑电图,在线参考左乳突。离线时,将数据系统地重新参考到平均参考、平均乳突、平均耳垂、非头部和鼻子。研究了跨参考电极的时间、幅值和效应的相关性。
(1)N170和VPP成分的幅值在不同参考下以精确相反的方式变化;(2)对于所有参考电极,N170和VPP的峰值在时间上是一致的;(3)两个成分都可以由相同的偶极配置来解释;(4)这些成分表现出相同的功能特性。
VPP和N170是同一脑发生器的两个“面孔”。
在ERP研究中观察到的N170/VPP差异效应可以通过参考方法的差异来解释。