• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对乙酰氨基酚与右布洛芬在发热儿童中的退热疗效及安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照、3期临床试验

The antipyretic efficacy and safety of propacetamol compared with dexibuprofen in febrile children: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative, phase 3 clinical trial.

作者信息

Choi Seung Jun, Moon Sena, Choi Ui Yoon, Chun Yoon Hong, Lee Jung Hyun, Rhim Jung Woo, Lee Jin, Kim Hwang Min, Jeong Dae Chul

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Graduate School of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 23;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1166-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-018-1166-z
PMID:29935535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6015655/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the antipyretic efficacy, safety, and tolerability between oral dexibuprofen and intravenous propacetamol in children with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) presenting with fever.

METHODS

Patients aging from 6 months to 14 years admitted for URTI with axillary body temperature ≥ 38.0 °C were enrolled and randomized into the study or control group. Patients in the study group were intravenously infused with propacetamol and subsequently oral placebo medication was administered. Patients in the control group were intravenously infused with 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution without propacetamol and then oral dexibuprofen was administered. We checked the body temperature of all patients at 0.5 h (hr), 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and 6 h after oral placebo or dexibuprofen had been applied.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients (125 in the study group) were finally enrolled. The body temperatures of patients in the study group were significantly lower until 2 h after administration (37.73 ± 0.58 vs 38.36 ± 0.69 °C (p < 0.001), 37.37 ± 0.53 vs 37.88 ± 0.69 °C (p < 0.001), 37.27 ± 0.60 vs 37.62 ± 0.66 °C (p < 0.001), 37.25 ± 0.62 vs 37.40 ± 0.60 °C (p = 0.0452), at 0.5 h, 1 h, 1.5 h, and 2 h, respectively). The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of the range of body temperature decrease, the Area Under the Curve of body temperature change for antipyretic administration-and-time relationship, the maximum value of body temperature decrease during the 6 h test period, the number of patients whose body temperature normalized (< 37.0 °C), the mean time when first normalization of body temperature, and the development of adverse events including gastrointestinal problem, elevated liver enzyme, and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous propacetamol may be a safe and effective choice for pediatric URTI patients presenting with fever who are not able to take oral medications or need faster fever control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRIS KCT0002888 . Date of registration: July 31st, 2013.

摘要

背景

我们旨在比较口服右布洛芬与静脉注射丙帕他莫对患有上呼吸道感染(URTI)并发热儿童的退热疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

纳入年龄在6个月至14岁、因URTI入院且腋窝体温≥38.0°C的患者,并随机分为研究组或对照组。研究组患者静脉输注丙帕他莫,随后给予口服安慰剂。对照组患者静脉输注100mL不含丙帕他莫的0.9%氯化钠溶液,然后口服右布洛芬。在口服安慰剂或右布洛芬后0.5小时(h)、1小时、1.5小时、2小时、3小时、4小时和6小时检查所有患者的体温。

结果

最终共纳入263例患者(研究组125例)。研究组患者在给药后2小时内体温显著较低(分别在0.5小时、1小时、1.5小时和2小时时,体温为37.73±0.58 vs 38.36±0.69°C(p<0.001),37.37±0.53 vs 37.88±0.69°C(p<0.001),37.27±0.60 vs 37.62±0.66°C(p<0.001),37.25±0.62 vs 37.40±0.60°C(p = 0.0452))。两组在体温下降幅度、退热给药与时间关系的体温变化曲线下面积、6小时测试期内体温下降的最大值、体温恢复正常(<37.0°C)的患者数量、首次体温恢复正常的平均时间以及包括胃肠道问题、肝酶升高和血小板减少在内的不良事件发生情况方面均无显著差异。

结论

对于不能口服药物或需要更快控制发热的小儿URTI发热患者,静脉注射丙帕他莫可能是一种安全有效的选择。

试验注册

CRIS KCT0002888。注册日期:2013年7月31日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/230c/6015655/f1e3c12127fc/12887_2018_1166_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/230c/6015655/5eb53ffc9257/12887_2018_1166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/230c/6015655/f1e3c12127fc/12887_2018_1166_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/230c/6015655/5eb53ffc9257/12887_2018_1166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/230c/6015655/f1e3c12127fc/12887_2018_1166_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The antipyretic efficacy and safety of propacetamol compared with dexibuprofen in febrile children: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative, phase 3 clinical trial.对乙酰氨基酚与右布洛芬在发热儿童中的退热疗效及安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照、3期临床试验
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 23;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1166-z.
2
Antipyretic efficacy and tolerability of a single intravenous dose of the acetaminophen prodrug propacetamol in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.对乙酰氨基酚前体药物丙帕他莫单次静脉给药在儿童中的退热疗效及耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.005.
3
Dexibuprofen for fever in children with upper respiratory tract infection.右旋布洛芬用于治疗上呼吸道感染儿童的发热
Pediatr Int. 2013 Aug;55(4):443-9. doi: 10.1111/ped.12125.
4
The effects and safety of dexibuprofen compared with ibuprofen in febrile children caused by upper respiratory tract infection.右布洛芬与布洛芬在上呼吸道感染所致发热儿童中的疗效及安全性比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;66(6):854-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03271.x.
5
Aspirin compared with acetaminophen in the treatment of fever and other symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection in adults: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, 6-hour dose-ranging study.阿司匹林与对乙酰氨基酚治疗成人发热及上呼吸道感染其他症状的比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照、平行组、单剂量、6小时剂量范围研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):993-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.002.
6
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-comparator trial to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of fever in hospitalized pediatric patients.一项多中心、随机、开放标签、活性对照试验,以确定静脉注射布洛芬治疗住院儿科患者发热的疗效、安全性和药代动力学。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 1;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0795-y.
7
Antipyretic efficacy and safety of a single intravenous administration of 15 mg/kg paracetamol versus 30 mg/kg propacetamol in children with acute fever due to infection.单次静脉注射15mg/kg对乙酰氨基酚与30mg/kg丙帕他莫治疗儿童感染性急性发热的退热疗效及安全性比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):221-9. doi: 10.5414/cpp45221.
8
Symptomatic intravenous antipyretic therapy: efficacy of metamizol, diclofenac, and propacetamol.症状性静脉注射退热疗法:安乃近、双氯芬酸和丙帕他莫的疗效
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Dec;24(6):608-15. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00520-1.
9
Single-dose, placebo-controlled comparative study of ibuprofen and acetaminophen antipyresis in children.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚对儿童退热作用的单剂量、安慰剂对照比较研究。
J Pediatr. 1991 Nov;119(5):803-11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80307-5.
10
Ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and placebo treatment of febrile children.布洛芬、对乙酰氨基酚及安慰剂对发热儿童的治疗
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989 Jul;46(1):9-17. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1989.100.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy and Safety of Pelubiprofen in the Treatment of Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Phase III Clinical Trial Compared to Loxoprofen.培氯布洛芬治疗急性上呼吸道感染的疗效与安全性:一项与洛索洛芬对比的多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性III期临床试验
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):1450. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051450.
2
Evaluation of the Regulatory Required Post-Authorization Safety Study for Propacetamol: Nested Case-Control and Case-Time-Control Studies.对帕瑞昔布钠的监管要求上市后安全性研究的评价:巢式病例对照和病例时间对照研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2024 Feb;65(2):120-128. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0207.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and indomethacin in closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates.对乙酰氨基酚、布洛芬和吲哚美辛在早产儿动脉导管未闭封堵中的疗效和安全性比较研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;176(2):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2830-7. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
2
Fever and the thermal regulation of immunity: the immune system feels the heat.发热与免疫的体温调节:免疫系统能感知热度。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Jun;15(6):335-49. doi: 10.1038/nri3843. Epub 2015 May 15.
3
Drug utilization, dosing, and costs after implementation of intravenous acetaminophen guidelines for pediatric patients.
Effectiveness and safety of rectal dexibuprofen versus oral ibuprofen for closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants with gestational age<34 weeks: A pilot study.
直肠给予右旋布洛芬与口服布洛芬治疗胎龄<34 周早产儿动脉导管未闭的有效性和安全性:一项初步研究。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan-Dec;37:3946320231152993. doi: 10.1177/03946320231152993.
4
A study of the regional differences in propacetamol-related adverse events using VigiBase data of the World Health Organization.一项使用世界卫生组织 VigiBase 数据研究帕瑞昔布钠相关不良事件的区域性差异的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 13;12(1):21568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26211-0.
5
Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在婴儿中的疗效和安全性:对过去 20 年文献的综合回顾。
Paediatr Drugs. 2022 Nov;24(6):603-655. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00514-1. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
6
Effects of acetaminophen and ibuprofen monotherapy in febrile children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬单一疗法治疗发热儿童的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Aug 22;18(4):965-981. doi: 10.5114/aoms/140875. eCollection 2022.
7
Letter to the Editor: Propacetamol-Induced Rhabdomyolysis or COVID-Vaccine-Related Inflammatory Myopathy?致编辑的信:丙帕他莫诱发的横纹肌溶解症还是与新冠疫苗相关的炎性肌病?
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May 30;37(21):e179. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e179.
8
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of subcutaneous acetaminophen in geriatrics and palliative care (APAPSUBQ).评估皮下用对乙酰氨基酚在老年病学和姑息治疗中的疗效和安全性(APAPSUBQ)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Mar 26;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00934-3.
9
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in acute viral respiratory tract infections: An updated systematic review.非甾体抗炎药在急性病毒性呼吸道感染中的应用:一项更新的系统评价。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Apr;10(2):e00925. doi: 10.1002/prp2.925.
10
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of intravenous paracetamol and ibuprofen on the treatment of tonsillopharyngitis with fever: A prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind clinical trial.静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬治疗发热性扁桃体咽炎疗效的比较评估:一项前瞻性、随机对照、双盲临床试验。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):177-183. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.329629. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
小儿患者静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚指南实施后的药物使用、剂量及成本
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Jan;19(1):35-41. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-19.1.35.
4
Dexibuprofen for fever in children with upper respiratory tract infection.右旋布洛芬用于治疗上呼吸道感染儿童的发热
Pediatr Int. 2013 Aug;55(4):443-9. doi: 10.1111/ped.12125.
5
In vitro and in vivo investigation of dexibuprofen derivatives for CNS delivery.在体和体外研究右旋布洛芬衍生物用于中枢神经系统传递。
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012 Feb;33(2):279-88. doi: 10.1038/aps.2011.144.
6
Is there a role for intravenous acetaminophen in pediatric emergency departments?静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚在儿科急诊科有作用吗?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Jun;27(6):496-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31821d8629.
7
Intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen).静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚(醋氨酚)。
Drugs. 2009;69(1):101-13. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00007.
8
The effects and safety of dexibuprofen compared with ibuprofen in febrile children caused by upper respiratory tract infection.右布洛芬与布洛芬在上呼吸道感染所致发热儿童中的疗效及安全性比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;66(6):854-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03271.x.
9
Antipyretic efficacy and safety of a single intravenous administration of 15 mg/kg paracetamol versus 30 mg/kg propacetamol in children with acute fever due to infection.单次静脉注射15mg/kg对乙酰氨基酚与30mg/kg丙帕他莫治疗儿童感染性急性发热的退热疗效及安全性比较
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):221-9. doi: 10.5414/cpp45221.
10
Antipyretic efficacy and tolerability of a single intravenous dose of the acetaminophen prodrug propacetamol in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.对乙酰氨基酚前体药物丙帕他莫单次静脉给药在儿童中的退热疗效及耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Clin Ther. 2006 May;28(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.005.