Kim Jeong A, Choi Youn Seon, Lee Juneyoung, Park Jeanno, Lee Myung Ah, Yeom Chang Hwan, Jang Se Kwon, Yoon Duck Mi, Kim Jun Suk
Department of Family Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2005 Oct;20(5):877-82. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.5.877.
The Korean Cancer Pain Assessment Tool (KCPAT), which was developed in 2003, consists of questions concerning the location of pain, the nature of pain, the present pain intensity, the symptoms associated with the pain, and psychosocial/spiritual pain assessments. This study was carried out to evaluate the reliability and validity of the KCPAT. A stratified, proportional-quota, clustered, systematic sampling procedure was used. The study population (903 cancer patients) was 1% of the target population (90,252 cancer patients). A total of 314 (34.8%) questionnaires were collected. The results showed that the average pain score (5 point on Likert scale) according to the cancer type and the at-present average pain score (VAS, 0-10) were correlated (r=0.56, p<0.0001), and showed moderate agreement (kappa=0.364). The mean satisfaction score was 3.8 (1-5). The average time to complete the questionnaire was 8.9 min. In conclusion, the KCPAT is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing cancer pain in Koreans.
韩国癌症疼痛评估工具（KCPAT）于2003年开发，由有关疼痛部位、疼痛性质、当前疼痛强度、与疼痛相关的症状以及心理社会/精神疼痛评估的问题组成。本研究旨在评估KCPAT的可靠性和有效性。采用了分层、按比例配额、整群、系统抽样程序。研究人群（903名癌症患者）占目标人群（90252名癌症患者）的1%。共收集到314份问卷（34.8%）。结果显示，根据癌症类型的平均疼痛评分（李克特量表5分制）与当前平均疼痛评分（视觉模拟量表，0 - 10）相关（r = 0.56，p < 0.0001），并显示出中度一致性（kappa = 0.364）。平均满意度评分为3.8（1 - 5）。完成问卷的平均时间为8.9分钟。总之，KCPAT是评估韩国人癌症疼痛的可靠且有效的工具。
