• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症疼痛患者与照料者评分的相关性

Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.

作者信息

Grossman S A, Sheidler V R, Swedeen K, Mucenski J, Piantadosi S

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Feb;6(2):53-7. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90518-9.

DOI:10.1016/0885-3924(91)90518-9
PMID:2007792
Abstract

Undertreatment of cancer pain is widely recognized. This study sought to determine if inadequate communication about pain intensity between health care providers and their patients could represent a significant factor interfering with the control of cancer pain. One hundred and three consecutive patients with solid tumors and normal mental status examinations were screened within 48 hr during two study periods. The intensity of patient pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) which was given to the patient, his/her primary care nurse, house officer and medical oncology fellow. Sixty-three percent of the patients were taking narcotic analgesics on admission to the hospital. Although there was a correlation between patient and health care provider ratings for the entire group, no statistically significant correlation between the patient's VAS pain score and that of his/her nurse, house officer, or oncology fellow was present in the 44 patients with VAS greater than or equal to 4.0. Agreement between patient and caregiver VAS scores was also examined. When patients rated their pain from 7-10 on the VAS scale, nurses, house officers, and oncology fellows would place their rating of the patient's pain in this range 7%, 20%, and 27% of the time, respectively. Improved correspondence was noted with lower patient VAS scores. This study demonstrates that health care provider impressions of patient pain are often quite different than those of the patient and that these discrepancies are most pronounced in patients with significant pain. The routine use of pain assessment tools, such as the VAS, could enhance patient-caregiver communication and improve care for patients with cancer pain.

摘要

癌症疼痛治疗不足已得到广泛认可。本研究旨在确定医疗服务提供者与其患者之间关于疼痛强度的沟通不足是否可能是干扰癌症疼痛控制的一个重要因素。在两个研究期间的48小时内,对103例连续的实体瘤患者且精神状态检查正常的患者进行了筛查。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对患者、其初级护理护士、住院医师和肿瘤内科住院医师评估患者的疼痛强度。63%的患者入院时正在服用麻醉性镇痛药。尽管整个组患者与医疗服务提供者的评分之间存在相关性,但在44例VAS大于或等于4.0的患者中,患者的VAS疼痛评分与其护士、住院医师或肿瘤内科住院医师的评分之间不存在统计学上的显著相关性。还检查了患者与护理人员VAS评分之间的一致性。当患者在VAS量表上将其疼痛评为7 - 10时,护士、住院医师和肿瘤内科住院医师分别会在7%、20%和27%的时间内将患者的疼痛评级置于该范围内。患者VAS评分较低时,一致性有所改善。本研究表明,医疗服务提供者对患者疼痛的印象往往与患者的印象有很大不同,而且这些差异在疼痛严重的患者中最为明显。常规使用疼痛评估工具,如VAS,可以加强患者与护理人员之间的沟通,并改善对癌症疼痛患者的护理。

相似文献

1
Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.癌症疼痛患者与照料者评分的相关性
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Feb;6(2):53-7. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90518-9.
2
Patients' and nurses' assessment of cancer pain.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1999 Dec;8(4):213-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00171.x.
3
Accuracy of emergency nurses in assessment of patients' pain.急诊护士评估患者疼痛的准确性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2003 Dec;4(4):171-5. doi: 10.1016/s1524-9042(03)00033-x.
4
The patient's report of pain.患者的疼痛报告。
Am J Nurs. 2001 Dec;101(12):73-4. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200112000-00039.
5
Nurses' response to pain communication from patients: a post-test experimental study.护士对患者疼痛沟通的反应:一项测试后实验研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jan;44(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.017. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
6
A comparative study of nurses' and elderly patients' ratings of pain and pain tolerance.护士与老年患者对疼痛及疼痛耐受性评分的比较研究
J Gerontol Nurs. 1999 May;25(5):30-6. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-19990501-12.
7
Undertreatment of acute pain in the emergency department: a challenge.急诊科急性疼痛治疗不足:一项挑战。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr;17(2):173-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi022. Epub 2005 Feb 21.
8
Categories of congruence between inpatient self-reported pain and nurses evaluation.住院患者自我报告疼痛与护士评估之间的一致性类别。
Eur J Pain. 2009 Oct;13(9):992-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.11.019. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
9
Factors influencing nurses' inferences about patient pain.影响护士对患者疼痛推断的因素。
Br J Nurs. 2000;9(6):334-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2000.9.6.6336.
10
Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity.用于测量癌症疼痛强度的口头数字评定量表的效度
Cancer Nurs. 1997 Apr;20(2):88-93. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199704000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Concordance between late effects reported by physicians and patients in a cohort of long-term Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: an analysis of data from nine consecutive EORTC-LYSA trials.长期霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者队列中医生与患者报告的迟发效应之间的一致性:对连续9项欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织-淋巴瘤研究组试验数据的分析
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Oct 18. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01694-0.
2
Popcorn in the pain clinic: A content analysis of the depiction of patients with chronic pain and their management in motion pictures.疼痛诊所里的爆米花:对电影中慢性疼痛患者及其治疗描述的内容分析
Can J Pain. 2022 Oct 27;6(1):195-210. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2123308. eCollection 2022.
3
Management of Physical Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer during the Last Weeks and Days of Life.
晚期癌症患者生命最后几周和几天的躯体症状管理。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;54(3):661-670. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.143. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
Treating persistent pain after breast cancer: practice gaps and future directions.乳腺癌后持续性疼痛的治疗:实践差距与未来方向。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Dec;17(6):1698-1707. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01194-z. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Difference in Estimation of Side Effects of Chemotherapy between Physicians and Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The Use of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in the Evaluation of Toxicity in Everyday Clinical Practice.早期乳腺癌患者与医生对化疗副作用估计的差异:在日常临床实践中使用患者报告结局(PROs)评估毒性
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 25;13(23):5922. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235922.
6
Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (RT) Compared With Standard RT: A Report From the NRG Oncology RTOG 1203 Study.与标准放疗相比,调强放疗(IMRT)改善患者报告结局:NRG 肿瘤学 RTOG 1203 研究报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1685-1692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02381. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
The role of patient-reported outcomes in outpatients receiving active anti-cancer treatment: impact on patients' quality of life.门诊接受积极抗癌治疗患者的患者报告结局的作用:对患者生活质量的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4697-4704. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04777-2. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
Patients in palliative care-Development of a predictive model for anxiety using routine data.姑息治疗患者——利用常规数据建立焦虑预测模型
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0179415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179415. eCollection 2017.
9
Advancing the efficiency and efficacy of patient reported outcomes with multivariate computer adaptive testing.通过多变量计算机自适应测试提高患者报告结局的效率和效果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):897-902. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx003.
10
Medical Evidence Influence on Inpatients and Nurses Pain Ratings Agreement.
Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:9267536. doi: 10.1155/2016/9267536. Epub 2016 Apr 28.