• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在韩国使用韩国癌症疼痛评估工具后患者对疼痛控制满意度的变化。

Change in patients' satisfaction with pain control after using the Korean cancer pain assessment tool in Korea.

作者信息

Choi Youn Seon, Kim Su Hyun, Kim Jun Suk, Lee Juneyoung, Kang Jin Hyoung, Kim Sam Yong, Kim Si Young, Kim Chul Soo, Song Hong Suk, Lim Ho Yeong, Yim Chang Yeol, Chung Ik Joo, Cho Goon Jae, Lee Myung Ah, Park Jeanno, Yeom Chang Hwan

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine (Y.S.C., S.H.K.), Internal Medicine (J.S.K.), College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Jun;31(6):553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.10.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.10.008
PMID:16793495
Abstract

Appropriate pain assessment is very important for managing cancer pain. This study was designed to evaluate the utility of the Korean Cancer Pain Assessment Tool (KCPAT) by assessing changes in the management of cancer pain. The changes in pain intensity, the pattern of drug prescriptions, and the patients' satisfaction with pain control were analyzed after using the KCPAT. The results indicated that pain medicine prescriptions were changed in 194 (51.5%) cases after using the KCPAT, and 69.5% of these changes were affected by the KCPAT. After using the KCPAT, pain intensity as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10cm) decreased (4.31+/-2.35 vs. 3.60+/-2.45, P<0.0001), and the presence of associated symptoms and psychosocial items was significantly reduced. The patients' satisfaction with pain control was improved. Forty-four physicians (89.8%) thought that the KCPAT was useful. The KCPAT improved patients' satisfaction with pain control and was a useful tool for evaluating and managing cancer pain.

摘要

恰当的疼痛评估对于癌症疼痛管理非常重要。本研究旨在通过评估癌症疼痛管理的变化来评价韩国癌症疼痛评估工具(KCPAT)的效用。在使用KCPAT后,分析了疼痛强度的变化、药物处方模式以及患者对疼痛控制的满意度。结果表明,使用KCPAT后,194例(51.5%)患者的止痛药物处方发生了改变,其中69.5%的改变受KCPAT影响。使用KCPAT后,视觉模拟量表(VAS,0 - 10厘米)评估的疼痛强度降低(4.31±2.35对3.60±2.45,P<0.0001),相关症状和心理社会项目的出现显著减少。患者对疼痛控制的满意度得到提高。44名医生(89.8%)认为KCPAT有用。KCPAT提高了患者对疼痛控制的满意度,是评估和管理癌症疼痛的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Change in patients' satisfaction with pain control after using the Korean cancer pain assessment tool in Korea.在韩国使用韩国癌症疼痛评估工具后患者对疼痛控制满意度的变化。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Jun;31(6):553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.10.008.
2
Progress of cancer pain management in Korea.韩国癌症疼痛管理的进展。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:4-6. doi: 10.1159/000143211. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
3
Patient satisfaction and documentation of pain assessments and management after implementing the adult nonverbal pain scale.实施成人非言语疼痛量表后患者满意度及疼痛评估和管理记录。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jul;19(4):345-54; quiz 355. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010247.
4
Reliability and validity of the Korean Cancer Pain Assessment Tool (KCPAT).韩国癌症疼痛评估工具(KCPAT)的信度和效度
J Korean Med Sci. 2005 Oct;20(5):877-82. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.5.877.
5
A satisfaction survey on cancer pain management using a self-reporting pain assessment tool.一项使用自我报告疼痛评估工具对癌症疼痛管理进行的满意度调查。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):225-31. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0021. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
6
Transdermal buprenorphine patches applied in a 4-day regimen versus a 3-day regimen: a single-site, Phase III, randomized, open-label, crossover comparison.透皮丁丙诺啡贴剂4天给药方案与3天给药方案的比较:一项单中心、III期、随机、开放标签、交叉对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Aug;29(8):1591-606. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.001.
7
Analgesic treatment and predictors of satisfaction with analgesia in patients with acute undifferentiated abdominal pain.急性未分化腹痛患者的镇痛治疗及镇痛满意度的预测因素
Eur J Pain. 2007 Oct;11(7):773-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
8
Assessing patients' satisfaction and intensity of pain as outcomes in the management of cancer-related pain.评估患者满意度及疼痛强度,以此作为癌症相关疼痛管理的结果。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Dec;11(5):424-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
9
Core aspects of satisfaction with pain management: cancer patients' perspectives.疼痛管理满意度的核心方面:癌症患者的观点。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jan;39(1):100-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
10
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压手术后患者临床评估与自我评估的前瞻性分析
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Treatment in Primary Care Through Eight Constitution Medicine: A Retrospective Real-World Study from South Korea.基于八纲体质医学的基层医疗疼痛治疗:一项来自韩国的回顾性真实世界研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 30;61(9):1564. doi: 10.3390/medicina61091564.
2
Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Analgesic Treatment: Findings from the Analgesic Treatment for Cancer Pain in Southeast Asia (ACE) Study.患者和医生对镇痛治疗的满意度:东南亚癌症疼痛镇痛治疗(ACE)研究的结果
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Apr 18;2018:2193710. doi: 10.1155/2018/2193710. eCollection 2018.
3
A theory-based educational intervention targeting nurses' attitudes and knowledge concerning cancer-related pain management: a study protocol of a quasi-experimental design.
基于理论的教育干预措施,针对护士对癌症相关疼痛管理的态度和知识:一项准实验设计的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 23;11:233. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-233.