Kavanagh Anne M, Goller Jane L, King Tania, Jolley Damien, Crawford David, Turrell Gavin
Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Nov;59(11):934-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.035931.
To estimate variation between small areas in the levels of walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and overall physical activity and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation.
All census collector districts (CCDs) in the 20 innermost local government areas in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, were identified and ranked by the percentage of low income households (<400 dollars/week) living in the CCD. Fifty CCDs were randomly selected from the least, middle, and most disadvantaged septiles of the ranked CCDs and 2349 residents (58.7% participation rate) participated in a cross sectional postal survey about physical activity. Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for extrabinomial variation) was used to estimate area level variation in walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and in overall physical activity participation, and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation.
There were significant variations between CCDs in all activities and in overall physical participation in age and sex adjusted models; however, after adjustment for individual SES (income, occupation, education) and area level socioeconomic disadvantage, significant differences remained only for walking (p = 0.004), cycling (p = 0.003), and swimming (p = 0.024). Living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of jogging and of having overall physical activity levels that were sufficiently active for health; these effects remained after adjustment for individual socioeconomic status (sufficiently active: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90 and jogging: OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94).
These research findings support the need to focus on improving local environments to increase physical activity participation.
评估小区域之间步行、骑自行车、慢跑和游泳水平以及总体身体活动水平的差异,以及区域层面社会经济劣势在预测身体活动参与情况方面的重要性。
确定了澳大利亚墨尔本大都市区最内层20个地方政府区域内的所有普查收集区(CCD),并根据居住在该普查收集区内的低收入家庭(每周收入低于400澳元)的比例进行排名。从排名后的普查收集区中最贫困、中等贫困和最不贫困的七个等级中随机抽取50个普查收集区,2349名居民(参与率58.7%)参与了一项关于身体活动的横断面邮寄调查。采用多水平逻辑回归(针对超二项分布变异进行调整)来评估步行、骑自行车、慢跑和游泳以及总体身体活动参与方面的区域层面差异,以及区域层面社会经济劣势在预测身体活动参与情况方面的重要性。
在年龄和性别调整模型中,所有活动以及总体身体参与情况在普查收集区之间存在显著差异;然而,在调整了个体社会经济地位(收入、职业、教育程度)和区域层面社会经济劣势后,仅步行(p = 0.004)、骑自行车(p = 0.003)和游泳(p = 0.024)仍存在显著差异。生活在社会经济最不利地区与慢跑可能性降低以及总体身体活动水平未达到对健康足够活跃的水平相关;在调整个体社会经济地位后,这些影响仍然存在(足够活跃:比值比0.70,95%可信区间0.55至0.90;慢跑:比值比 = 0.69,95%可信区间0.51至0.94)。
这些研究结果支持需要专注于改善当地环境以增加身体活动参与。