• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邻里开放空间特征与老年人步行及社交互动之间的关联——一项混合方法研究

Associations between Neighborhood Open Space Features and Walking and Social Interaction in Older Adults-A Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Schmidt Tanja, Kerr Jacqueline, Schipperijn Jasper

机构信息

Research Unit for Active Living, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Jul 6;4(3):41. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4030041.

DOI:10.3390/geriatrics4030041
PMID:31284590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6787595/
Abstract

Neighborhood Open Spaces (NOS) such as public spaces around people's homes, parks and village greens, may support activity and socializing for older adults. These spaces might be especially important for older adults as they typically are less mobile and have smaller activity spaces and social networks than other age groups. The present exploratory sequential mixed methods study investigates the association between built environment features, social interaction, and walking within NOS, among older adults living in a low socio-economic neighborhood in Copenhagen. Interviews, the Community Park Audit Tool, and the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) were used to capture quantitative and qualitative data on 353 older adults (59-90 years old) within 11 NOS. Walking was predicted by the condition and shade along paths, seating and landscaping. Social interaction was negatively associated with walking, suggesting that older adults tend to sit down when engaging in social activities. Interviews highlighted the importance of social interaction within NOS. Future designs of NOS should acknowledge the importance of social meeting places, but at the same time provide walkable spaces for older adults to promote healthy aging.

摘要

邻里开放空间(NOS),如人们家周围的公共场所、公园和乡村绿地,可能会促进老年人的活动和社交。这些空间对老年人可能尤为重要,因为与其他年龄组相比,他们的行动能力通常较差,活动空间和社交网络也较小。本探索性序贯混合方法研究调查了哥本哈根一个社会经济地位较低社区的老年人在邻里开放空间中的建筑环境特征、社交互动和步行之间的关联。通过访谈、社区公园审计工具和社区游戏与娱乐观察系统(SOPARC)收集了11个邻里开放空间中353名老年人(59至90岁)的定量和定性数据。步行受到路径状况、遮荫、座位和景观美化的影响。社交互动与步行呈负相关,这表明老年人在参与社交活动时往往会坐下。访谈强调了邻里开放空间内社交互动的重要性。邻里开放空间的未来设计应认识到社交聚会场所的重要性,但同时也要为老年人提供适宜步行的空间,以促进健康老龄化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca9/6787595/27255083284e/geriatrics-04-00041-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca9/6787595/15061e42a112/geriatrics-04-00041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca9/6787595/27255083284e/geriatrics-04-00041-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca9/6787595/15061e42a112/geriatrics-04-00041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca9/6787595/27255083284e/geriatrics-04-00041-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations between Neighborhood Open Space Features and Walking and Social Interaction in Older Adults-A Mixed Methods Study.邻里开放空间特征与老年人步行及社交互动之间的关联——一项混合方法研究
Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Jul 6;4(3):41. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4030041.
2
Investigating the WHAT and WHY on older adults' use of neighborhood open spaces following an environmental intervention.调查环境干预后老年人使用邻里开放空间的“是什么”和“为什么”。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):582-596. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa004.
3
Everyday Walking Among Older Adults and the Neighborhood Built Environment: A Comparison Between Two Cities in North America.北美两个城市中老年人的日常步行与邻里建成环境:一项比较研究
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;8:564533. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.564533. eCollection 2020.
4
Safe, Affordable, Convenient: Environmental Features of Malls and Other Public Spaces Used by Older Adults for Walking.安全、经济实惠、便利:老年人用于步行的商场及其他公共场所的环境特征。
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Mar;13(3):289-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0118. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Understanding older adults' usage of community green spaces in Taipei, Taiwan.了解台湾台北市老年人对社区绿地的使用情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jan 27;11(2):1444-64. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110201444.
6
Do Inequalities in Neighborhood Walkability Drive Disparities in Older Adults' Outdoor Walking?邻里步行便利性的不平等是否会导致老年人户外步行的差异?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 7;14(7):740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070740.
7
Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces.休闲步行与邻里开放空间的吸引力、大小和接近程度之间的关联。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Sep;100(9):1752-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.182006. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
8
An Observational Assessment of Park-based Physical Activity in Older Adults in Nanchang, China.中国南昌老年人基于公园的身体活动的观察性评估
Am J Health Behav. 2019 Nov 1;43(6):1119-1128. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.43.6.9.
9
Location Choice in the Context of Older Adults' Leisure-Time Walking.老年人闲暇时间散步的地点选择。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 2;17(13):4775. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134775.
10
Cardiovascular diseases in middle aged and older adults in China: the joint effects and mediation of different types of physical exercise and neighborhood greenness and walkability.中国中老年人心血管疾病:不同类型的身体活动与邻里绿化和可步行性的联合作用及中介作用。
Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding for whom, under which circumstances and how sedentary behaviour interventions for older adults work: a realist review.了解针对老年人的久坐行为干预措施对谁有效、在何种情况下有效以及如何起作用:一项现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e095775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095775.
2
Park proximity, housing characteristics, and self-reported health among older adults in China.中国老年人的公园距离、住房特征与自我报告的健康状况
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06245-5.
3
Exploring the influence of path environment factors on walking behavior in urban parks with configuration attribute control.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond "Move More": Feeling the Rhythms of physical activity in mid and later-life.超越“多运动”:感受中年和晚年身体活动的节奏。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jun;231:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 4.
2
Investigating associations between the built environment and physical activity among older people in 20 UK towns.调查 20 个英国城镇中老年人的建筑环境与身体活动之间的关联。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Feb;72(2):121-131. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209440. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures.
通过配置属性控制探索路径环境因素对城市公园步行行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0329278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329278. eCollection 2025.
4
Health equity in urban and rural settings: implementation of the place standard tool in Spain.城乡卫生公平性:西班牙地方标准工具的实施。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1292032. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292032. eCollection 2024.
5
The influence of community park characteristics on satisfaction in Guangzhou: Moderating and mediating effects analysis.广州市社区公园特征对满意度的影响:调节与中介效应分析
Heliyon. 2024 May 10;10(10):e31043. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31043. eCollection 2024 May 30.
6
How do urban green spaces influence heat-related mortality in elderly? A realist synthesis.城市绿地如何影响老年人的热相关死亡率?一个现实主义的综合。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17973-5.
7
A systematic review on the relationship between the built environment and children's quality of life.系统综述:建筑环境与儿童生活质量的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):2472. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17388-8.
8
Neighborhood Built Environments and Health in Later Life: A Literature Review.社区建成环境与晚年健康:文献综述。
J Aging Health. 2025 Jan;37(1-2):3-17. doi: 10.1177/08982643231217776. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
Harnessing Citizen Science to Assess and Improve Utilization of Metropolitan Parks: the Park Activity, Recreation, and Community Study (PARCS) in St. Louis, MO.利用公民科学评估和改善城市公园的使用情况:密苏里州圣路易斯市的公园活动、娱乐与社区研究(PARCS)
J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2021 Dec 10;1(4):198-215. eCollection 2021.
10
Elucidating and Expanding the Restorative Theory Framework to Comprehend Influential Factors Supporting Ageing-in-Place: A Scoping Review.阐明和扩展恢复理论框架,以理解支持就地老龄化的影响因素:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;20(18):6801. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186801.
社区游戏与娱乐观察系统(SOPARC):可靠性与可行性测量
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S208-S222. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208.
4
Built environmental correlates of older adults' total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人总体身体活动和步行的建筑环境相关因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Aug 7;14(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z.
5
Move the Neighbourhood: Study design of a community-based participatory public open space intervention in a Danish deprived neighbourhood to promote active living.邻里行动:丹麦贫困社区基于社区参与的公共开放空间干预促进积极生活方式的研究设计
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 19;17(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4423-4.
6
Social and Physical Environmental Factors Influencing Adolescents' Physical Activity in Urban Public Open Spaces: A Qualitative Study Using Walk-Along Interviews.影响青少年在城市公共开放空间进行体育活动的社会和物理环境因素:一项采用随行访谈的定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0155686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155686. eCollection 2016.
7
Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study.全球14个城市中与城市环境相关的身体活动:一项横断面研究。
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2207-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Updating the Evidence for Physical Activity: Summative Reviews of the Epidemiological Evidence, Prevalence, and Interventions to Promote "Active Aging".更新体力活动证据:对流行病学证据、流行率以及促进“积极老龄化”干预措施的总结性综述。
Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S268-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw031.
9
Park characteristics, use, and physical activity: A review of studies using SOPARC (System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities).公园特征、使用情况与身体活动:对使用SOPARC(社区游戏与娱乐观察系统)的研究综述
Prev Med. 2016 May;86:153-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults.疗愈景观与晚年福祉:老年群体的蓝色和绿色空间影响。
Health Place. 2015 Jul;34:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 18.