Currie Graeme P, Lee Daniel K C, Srivastava Prasima
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN Scotland, UK.
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2954-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2954.
Despite the widespread use of inhaled corticosteroids, many asthmatic patients experience persistent symptoms. In such individuals, the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) is frequently more effective than doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid. However, the role of additional therapy with a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) as an alternative to an LABA has been the focus of attention in recent studies. In order to determine the overall efficacy of the pharmacologic armamentarium used in asthma, it is imperative that a combination of end points, including lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness, effects on underlying inflammation, symptoms, and more long-term sequelae such as exacerbations, are assessed. This evidence-based systematic review outlines the pharmacologic properties of LABAs and LTRAs and the importance of evaluating end points in addition to lung function when assessing these drugs. We also highlight the results of all published studies that have performed direct comparisons of both LABAs and LTRAs as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids.
尽管吸入性糖皮质激素被广泛使用,但许多哮喘患者仍有持续症状。在这些患者中,加用长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)通常比将吸入性糖皮质激素剂量加倍更有效。然而,近年来,白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA)作为LABA的替代药物进行额外治疗的作用一直是研究的焦点。为了确定用于哮喘治疗的药物库的总体疗效,必须评估包括肺功能、气道高反应性、对潜在炎症的影响、症状以及更长期的后果(如病情加重)等在内的一系列终点指标。这篇基于证据的系统评价概述了LABA和LTRA的药理特性,以及在评估这些药物时除肺功能外评估终点指标的重要性。我们还强调了所有已发表的将LABA和LTRA作为吸入性糖皮质激素附加治疗进行直接比较的研究结果。