Sobieraj Diana M, Baker William L, Nguyen Elaine, Weeda Erin R, Coleman Craig I, White C Michael, Lazarus Stephen C, Blake Kathryn V, Lang Jason E
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA. 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1473-1484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2757.
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a potential adjunct therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of persistent asthma.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects associated with LAMA vs placebo or vs other controllers as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and the use of a LAMA as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists (LABAs; hereafter referred to as triple therapy) vs inhaled corticosteroids and LABA in patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries (earliest date through November 28, 2017).
Two reviewers selected randomized clinical trials or observational studies evaluating a LAMA vs placebo or vs another controller as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids or triple therapy vs inhaled corticosteroids and LABA in patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma reporting on an outcome of interest.
Meta-analyses using a random-effects model was conducted to calculate risk ratios (RRs), risk differences (RDs), and mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Citation screening, data abstraction, risk assessment, and strength-of-evidence grading were completed by 2 independent reviewers.
Asthma exacerbations.
Of 1326 records identified, 15 randomized clinical trials (N = 7122 patients) were included. Most trials assessed adding LAMA vs placebo or LAMA vs LABA to inhaled corticosteroids. Adding LAMA vs placebo to inhaled corticosteroids was associated with a significantly reduced risk of exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92]; RD, -0.02 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00]). Compared with adding LABA, adding LAMA to inhaled corticosteroids was not associated with significant improvements in exacerbation risk (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.42]; RD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.02]), or any other outcomes of interest. Triple therapy was not significantly associated with improved exacerbation risk vs inhaled corticosteroids and LABA (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.57 to 1.22]; RD, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.08 to 0.07]).
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of LAMA compared with placebo as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbations; however, the association of LAMA with benefit may not be greater than that with LABA. Triple therapy was not associated with a lower risk of exacerbations.
长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)在持续性哮喘管理中是吸入性糖皮质激素的一种潜在辅助治疗方法。
对LAMA与安慰剂或与其他控制药物作为吸入性糖皮质激素的附加治疗相关的效果,以及LAMA作为吸入性糖皮质激素和长效β受体激动剂(LABA,以下简称三联疗法)的附加治疗与吸入性糖皮质激素和LABA在未控制的持续性哮喘患者中的使用进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane数据库和临床试验注册库(最早日期至2017年11月28日)。
两名评价员选择随机临床试验或观察性研究,评估LAMA与安慰剂或与另一种控制药物作为吸入性糖皮质激素的附加治疗,或三联疗法与吸入性糖皮质激素和LABA在未控制的持续性哮喘患者中对感兴趣结局的报告情况。
采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以计算风险比(RRs)、风险差异(RDs)和平均差异(MDs)及相应的95%置信区间。文献筛选、数据提取、风险评估和证据强度分级由2名独立评价员完成。
哮喘急性加重。
在识别出的1326条记录中,纳入了15项随机临床试验(N = 7122例患者)。大多数试验评估了在吸入性糖皮质激素基础上加用LAMA与安慰剂或LAMA与LABA的情况。在吸入性糖皮质激素基础上加用LAMA与安慰剂相比,需要全身使用糖皮质激素的急性加重风险显著降低(RR,0.67 [95%CI,0.48至0.92];RD,-0.02 [95%CI,-0.04至0.00])。与加用LABA相比,在吸入性糖皮质激素基础上加用LAMA在急性加重风险(RR,0.87 [95%CI,0.53至1.42];RD,0.00 [95%CI,-0.02至0.02])或任何其他感兴趣的结局方面未显示出显著改善。与吸入性糖皮质激素和LABA相比,三联疗法在急性加重风险方面未显示出显著改善(RR,0.84 [95%CI,0.57至1.22];RD,-0.01 [95%CI,-0.08至0.07])。
在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,LAMA作为吸入性糖皮质激素的附加治疗与较低的哮喘急性加重风险相关;然而,LAMA的获益可能并不大于LABA。三联疗法与较低的急性加重风险无关。