Russell-Brown P, Piedrahita C, Foldesy R, Steiner M, Townsend J
Population Council, New York, N.Y. 10017.
Contraception. 1992 May;45(5):429-37. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90156-n.
This paper combines results from a study of the determinants of condom quality and use conducted by The Population Council in two countries in the Caribbean with results from a condom breakage study conducted by Family Health International (FHI) in the United States. The studies, conducted two years apart, compared the breakage rates of condoms from the same lot during human use to their performance in laboratory test results. Breakage rates of 12.9% for Barbados, 10.1% for St. Lucia and 6.7% for the United States compared to passing ASTM laboratory tests suggest that existing laboratory tests as used with the current pass/fail standards are either not sufficiently sensitive or not well-defined to reliably predict condom performance during human use. The study also suggests that user behaviors and practices may be a factor in condom breakage. If the condom is to be an effective method against unplanned pregnancy and STD/HIV infection, and if consumer confidence is to be retained, condom breakage during sexual intercourse must be reduced.
本文将人口理事会在加勒比地区两个国家开展的一项关于避孕套质量及使用决定因素的研究结果,与国际家庭健康组织(FHI)在美国进行的一项避孕套破损率研究结果相结合。这两项相隔两年开展的研究,比较了同一批次避孕套在实际使用中的破损率与其在实验室测试中的表现。巴巴多斯的破损率为12.9%,圣卢西亚为10.1%,美国为6.7%,与通过美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)实验室测试相比,这表明按照当前的通过/不通过标准使用的现有实验室测试,要么不够灵敏,要么定义不够明确,无法可靠地预测避孕套在实际使用中的性能。该研究还表明,使用者的行为和习惯可能是导致避孕套破损的一个因素。如果避孕套要成为预防意外怀孕和性传播疾病/艾滋病毒感染的有效方法,并且要保持消费者信心,就必须降低性交过程中避孕套的破损率。