Suppr超能文献

乳胶避孕套在一项对照临床试验中的破裂和滑脱情况。

Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Rosenberg M J, Waugh M S

机构信息

Health Decisions, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 1997 Jul;56(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00069-3.

Abstract

Although millions of couples rely on male latex condoms to protect against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, their use is limited in part by questions about their performance. Rates of condom breakage and slippage, two measures of performance, vary broadly across studies. This variation in part reflects study variability and limitations, including sample size, reliance on subjects' memory, user populations, and products evaluated. In an effort to define condom performance in a group of monogamous couples typical of those using condoms for contraception, we conducted a clinical trial of a single brand of lubricated condoms (Durex Ramses). A total of 4637 attempts to use the condom were evaluated. Six breaks occurred before intercourse (nonclinical breaks), and 10 condoms broke during intercourse or were only noted to have broken upon withdrawal (clinical breaks), resulting in a nonclinical breakage rate of 0.13% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.28%), clinical breakage rate of 0.28% (0.15-0.48%), and a total breakage rate of 0.41% (0.25-0.64%). The rate of complete slippage was 0.63% (0.42-0.90%), and total failure (clinical breaks plus complete slips) was 1.04% (0.76-1.37%). These rates are lower than those in other studies with the exception of one, a prospective investigation in a population of female prostitutes. Results indicate that condoms can, in experienced, motivated populations, provide excellent performance and suggest that their efficacy at preventing pregnancy may equal that of the most reliable forms of contraception. Because this study involved a single condom brand, these results may not be generalizable to other brands.

摘要

尽管数以百万计的夫妇依靠男用乳胶避孕套来防止意外怀孕和性传播感染,但避孕套的使用在一定程度上受到其性能问题的限制。避孕套破裂率和滑脱率是衡量性能的两个指标,不同研究中的这两个指标差异很大。这种差异部分反映了研究的变异性和局限性,包括样本量、对受试者记忆的依赖、使用人群以及所评估的产品。为了确定在一组典型的使用避孕套进行避孕的一夫一妻制夫妇中避孕套的性能,我们对单一品牌的润滑避孕套(杜蕾斯埃及艳后)进行了一项临床试验。共评估了4637次避孕套使用尝试。性交前发生了6次破裂(非临床破裂),性交期间有10个避孕套破裂或仅在取出时才发现破裂(临床破裂),导致非临床破裂率为0.13%(95%置信区间,0.05 - 0.28%),临床破裂率为0.28%(0.15 - 0.48%),总破裂率为0.41%(0.25 - 0.64%)。完全滑脱率为0.63%(0.42 - 0.90%),总失败率(临床破裂加完全滑脱)为1.04%(0.76 - 1.37%)。除了一项针对女性妓女群体的前瞻性调查外,这些比率低于其他研究中的比率。结果表明,在经验丰富、积极性高的人群中,避孕套可以提供出色的性能,并表明其预防怀孕的效果可能与最可靠的避孕方式相当。由于本研究只涉及单一品牌的避孕套,这些结果可能不适用于其他品牌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验