Wang You-Gan, Leung Denis Heng-Yan, Li Ming, Tan Say-Beng
Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2005 Oct;14(5):445-56. doi: 10.1191/0962280205sm410oa.
So far, most Phase II trials have been designed and analysed under a frequentist framework. Under this framework, a trial is designed so that the overall Type I and Type II errors of the trial are controlled at some desired levels. Recently, a number of articles have advocated the use of Bayesian designs in practice. Under a Bayesian framework, a trial is designed so that the trial stops when the posterior probability of treatment is within certain prespecified thresholds. In this article, we argue that trials under a Bayesian framework can also be designed to control frequentist error rates. We introduce a Bayesian version of Simon's well-known two-stage design to achieve this goal. We also consider two other errors, which are called Bayesian errors in this article because of their similarities to posterior probabilities. We show that our method can also control these Bayesian-type errors. We compare our method with other recent Bayesian designs in a numerical study and discuss implications of different designs on error rates. An example of a clinical trial for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma is used to illustrate differences of the different designs.
到目前为止,大多数II期试验都是在频率论框架下进行设计和分析的。在这个框架下,设计试验时要将试验的总体I型错误和II型错误控制在某些期望的水平。最近,一些文章主张在实际中使用贝叶斯设计。在贝叶斯框架下,设计试验时要使得当治疗的后验概率处于某些预先指定的阈值范围内时试验停止。在本文中,我们认为在贝叶斯框架下的试验也可以设计为控制频率论错误率。我们引入西蒙著名的两阶段设计的贝叶斯版本来实现这一目标。我们还考虑了另外两种错误,由于它们与后验概率相似,在本文中被称为贝叶斯错误。我们表明我们的方法也可以控制这些贝叶斯类型的错误。我们在数值研究中将我们的方法与其他近期的贝叶斯设计进行比较,并讨论不同设计对错误率的影响。使用一个鼻咽癌患者临床试验的例子来说明不同设计的差异。