Ferreira Junior Orlando C, Ferreira Cristine, Riedel Maristela, Widolin Marcya Regina Visinoni, Barbosa-Júnior Aristides
Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Department of Genetics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
AIDS. 2005 Oct;19 Suppl 4:S70-5. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000191494.51489.75.
This assessment in Brazil was to evaluate the performance of commercially available HIV rapid test (RT) against the gold standard testing and to establish a highly sensitive and specific RT algorithm for HIV diagnosis.
A prospective, anonymous and unlinked study.
An evaluation of seven commercially available RT to compare their performance against the gold standard tests for Brazil. This includes two competing enzyme immunoassays plus a Western blot for confirmation. After informed consent, whole blood samples were collected from volunteers in voluntary counselling and testing sites (n = 400), antenatal clinics (n = 500) and from HIV-positive controls in AIDS treatment centres (n = 200). Two seroconversion panels, one HIV-1 subtype (B, B', C and F) panel and an operational assay performance evaluation were also part of the study parameters.
For the seven RT the clinical sensitivity ranged from 97.74 to 100% and clinical specificity from 99.43 to 100%. However, only four RT were considered acceptable after full evaluation. The two EIA had a clinical sensitivity of 100% and clinical specificity of 99.32 and 99.66%. Two RT had the same performance on the seroconversions panels as the EIA. The operational assay performance evaluation for the RT indicated that Hexagon and Capillus could not be classified as simple assays.
We have provided evidence that RT assays can perform equally or better than EIA for the detection of HIV antibodies. The simplicity and rapidity of the RT warrants its utilization in an algorithm for a rapid diagnosis of HIV infection.
在巴西进行的这项评估旨在评估市售HIV快速检测(RT)相对于金标准检测的性能,并建立一种用于HIV诊断的高灵敏度和高特异性的RT算法。
一项前瞻性、匿名且非关联研究。
对七种市售RT进行评估,以比较它们相对于巴西金标准检测的性能。这包括两种竞争性酶免疫测定法以及一种用于确认的蛋白质印迹法。在获得知情同意后,从自愿咨询和检测点的志愿者(n = 400)、产前诊所(n = 500)以及艾滋病治疗中心的HIV阳性对照者(n = 200)中采集全血样本。两个血清转化样本组、一个HIV-1亚型(B、B'、C和F)样本组以及一项操作检测性能评估也是研究参数的一部分。
对于这七种RT,临床敏感性范围为97.74%至100%,临床特异性范围为99.43%至100%。然而,经过全面评估后,只有四种RT被认为是可接受的。两种酶免疫测定法的临床敏感性为100%,临床特异性分别为99.32%和99.66%。两种RT在血清转化样本组中的表现与酶免疫测定法相同。对RT的操作检测性能评估表明,Hexagon和Capillus不能归类为简单检测方法。
我们已提供证据表明,RT检测在检测HIV抗体方面的表现可以与酶免疫测定法相当或更好。RT的简单性和快速性保证了其在快速诊断HIV感染算法中的应用。