Department of Complementary Propaedeutic & Post-Graduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Instituto Hermes Pardini SA, Vespasiano, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237438. eCollection 2020.
Rapid tests (RTs), also known as point-of-care tests, usually release results within 30 minutes with no need for a qualified staff, equipment, or laboratory structure. The Brazilian Ministry of Health published a resolution in 2013, recommending the use of RTs for the diagnosis of HIV infection, where one positive RT must be followed by another different RT. This was meant to increase the chance of proper diagnosis in specific settings and special populations. However, data comparing and validating the different HIV RTs available in Brazil are scarce. Therefore, the present study seeks to evaluate eight anti-HIV RTs available in the Brazilian market regarding their analytical performance: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and accuracy. We also evaluated the agreement between kits (Kappa index) and the quality of the reading pattern of the tests. This was an observational, analytical, and concordance study, in which previously defined positive and negative samples, based on their serological pattern for anti-HIV antibodies (chemiluminescent immunoassay-ECLIA-used as screening and Western Blot used as the confirmatory test) were tested. Analytical performance and Kappa index were calculated, considering a 95% CI and p<0.05. This study identified differences in the performances of the eight tested kits. Six out of eight RTs showed good performance and can be used in the routine laboratory and health care units as screening tests. Regarding the quality of the RT band reading pattern, two brands had several samples showing quite faint bands, thus compromising its use in clinical and laboratory settings.
快速检测(RTs),也称为即时检测,通常在 30 分钟内得出结果,无需合格的人员、设备或实验室结构。巴西卫生部于 2013 年发布了一项决议,建议使用 RTs 进行 HIV 感染诊断,其中一种阳性 RT 必须由另一种不同的 RT 跟进。这是为了增加在特定环境和特殊人群中正确诊断的机会。然而,比较和验证巴西可用的不同 HIV RTs 的数据很少。因此,本研究旨在评估巴西市场上现有的八种抗 HIV RTs 的分析性能:敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、阳性和阴性似然比以及准确性。我们还评估了试剂盒之间的一致性(Kappa 指数)和测试读取模式的质量。这是一项观察性、分析性和一致性研究,其中根据其抗 HIV 抗体的血清学模式(化学发光免疫分析 - ECLIA 用作筛选,Western Blot 用作确认测试)预先定义了阳性和阴性样本,并对其进行了测试。分析性能和 Kappa 指数的计算考虑了 95%CI 和 p<0.05。本研究发现,所测试的八种试剂盒的性能存在差异。八种 RTs 中有六种具有良好的性能,可以在常规实验室和医疗保健单位中用作筛选测试。关于 RT 带读取模式的质量,有两个品牌的多个样本显示出相当弱的条带,从而影响了其在临床和实验室环境中的使用。