Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验,旨在评估提供研究结果作为激励措施以提高邮寄问卷回复率的有效性[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN26118436]

A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436].

作者信息

Cockayne Sarah, Torgerson David J

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Area 4 Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 26;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-34.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postal questionnaires are widely used to collect outcome data on participants. However, a poor response to questionnaires will reduce the statistical power of the study and may introduce bias. A meta analysis of ten trials offering study results, largely in the fields of education and marketing, was shown to be ineffective, with the odds ratio for response with offering research findings is 0.92 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.11). However uncertainty still exists as it is uncertain whether results from such trials can be extrapolated to that of a health care setting. The aim of this study was to assess whether offering participants study results increases the response rates to postal questionnaires.

METHODS

1038 women aged over 70 years were remotely randomised by computer in a 3:1 ratio. 250 participants did not receive the offer of knowing the results of the trial and 788 participants were offered the results of the trial in a postal questionnaire. The main outcome measure was response rate. Chi square test was used to evaluate the overall differences in response rate between the two groups. An adjusted analysis, adjusting for whether the participant was taking calcium and age was also undertaken.

RESULTS

The response rates were not significantly different Odds Ratio 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.48 to 1.63) p = 0.69.

CONCLUSION

Offering study results to women living in the community aged over 70 does not increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Although researchers have an ethical obligation to offer participants study results, since 10% of women did not wish to receive the results, investigators should give participants the option to opt out of receiving the study's results.

摘要

背景

邮政问卷调查被广泛用于收集参与者的结果数据。然而,问卷回复率低会降低研究的统计效力,并可能引入偏差。一项对十项提供研究结果的试验(主要在教育和营销领域)的荟萃分析显示效果不佳,提供研究结果时的回复比值比为0.92(95%置信区间0.75至1.11)。然而,由于不确定此类试验的结果是否可外推至医疗保健环境,不确定性仍然存在。本研究的目的是评估向参与者提供研究结果是否会提高邮政问卷的回复率。

方法

1038名70岁以上的女性通过计算机以3:1的比例进行远程随机分组。250名参与者未收到了解试验结果的提议,788名参与者在邮政问卷中收到了试验结果。主要结局指标是回复率。采用卡方检验评估两组回复率的总体差异。还进行了调整分析,调整了参与者是否服用钙和年龄因素。

结果

回复率无显著差异,比值比为0.88(95%置信区间0.48至1.63),p = 0.69。

结论

向70岁以上居住在社区的女性提供研究结果不会提高邮政问卷的回复率。尽管研究人员有道德义务向参与者提供研究结果,但由于10%的女性不希望收到结果,研究人员应给予参与者选择不接收研究结果的权利。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验