Smith Andrew F, Pope Catherine, Goodwin Dawn, Mort Maggie
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster LA1 4RP, UK.
Can J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;52(9):915-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03022051.
Although the importance of communication skills in anesthetic practice is increasingly recognized, formal communication skills training has hitherto dealt only with limited aspects of this professional activity. We aimed to document and analyze the informally-learned communication that takes place between anesthesia personnel and patients at induction of and emergence from general anesthesia.
We adopted an ethnographic approach based principally on observation of anesthesia personnel at work in the operating theatres with subsequent analysis of observation transcripts.
We noted three main styles of communication on induction, commonly combined in a single induction. In order of frequency, these were: (1) descriptive, where the anesthesiologists explained to the patient what he/she might expect to feel; (2) functional, which seemed designed to help anesthesiologists maintain physiological stability or assess the changing depth of anesthesia and (3) evocative, which referred to images or metaphors. Although the talk we have described is nominally directed at the patient, it also signifies to other members of the anesthetic team how induction is progressing. The team may also contribute to the communication behaviour depending on the context. Communication on emergence usually focused on establishing that the patient was awake.
Communication at induction and emergence tends to fall into specific patterns with different emphases but similar functions. This communication work is shared across the anesthetic team. Further work could usefully explore the relationship between communication styles and team performance or indicators of patient safety or well-being.
尽管沟通技巧在麻醉实践中的重要性日益得到认可,但迄今为止,正式的沟通技巧培训仅涉及这一专业活动的有限方面。我们旨在记录和分析全身麻醉诱导期和苏醒期麻醉人员与患者之间的非正式学习沟通情况。
我们采用了一种人种志方法,主要基于对手术室中麻醉人员工作的观察,随后对观察记录进行分析。
我们注意到诱导期有三种主要的沟通方式,通常在一次诱导中结合使用。按出现频率排序,分别为:(1)描述性,麻醉医生向患者解释其可能会感觉到的情况;(2)功能性,似乎旨在帮助麻醉医生维持生理稳定或评估麻醉深度的变化;(3)唤起性,涉及图像或隐喻。虽然我们所描述的谈话名义上是针对患者的,但它也向麻醉团队的其他成员表明诱导的进展情况。根据具体情况,团队成员也可能参与到沟通行为中。苏醒期的沟通通常侧重于确认患者已清醒。
诱导期和苏醒期的沟通往往呈现出特定模式,重点不同但功能相似。这项沟通工作由麻醉团队共同完成。进一步的研究可以有益地探讨沟通方式与团队表现或患者安全及福祉指标之间的关系。