Bibby K, Barrie T, Patterson K R, MacCuish A C
Glasgow Eye Infirmary.
J R Soc Med. 1992 Jun;85(6):326-8.
The accuracy and appropriateness of 115 consecutive referrals by non-consultant physicians to a specialist Diabetic Retinopathy Clinic were assessed in a retrospective study. The source of the referrals was masked throughout the study. Referrals were classed as 'appropriate' or 'inappropriate' for patient management, and the referral diagnosis (where specified) was compared with the ophthalmologist's initial assessment. It was graded as 'correct', 'partly correct' and 'incorrect'. Referrals from physicians who had received 40-50 hours of outpatient training in the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinic (group A, n = 49) were compared with referrals from doctors without this special instruction (group B, n = 66). Referral was deemed 'appropriate' in 32 (65%) of group A referrals, but in only 22 (33%) of group B (chi 2 = 11.54, df = 1, P less than 0.001). Referral diagnosis (when expressed) was graded as 'correct' in 28 (67%) of group A referrals compared with only 12 (30%) of group B, being 'incorrect' in 10 (25%) of group B referrals and just two (4.5%) of group A (chi 2 = 12.9, df = 2, P less than 0.005). Regular fundoscopy with accurate assessment and appropriate action is vital to prevent loss of vision in diabetic patients. Short-term outpatient training in a Diabetic Eye Clinic leads junior physicians to more appropriate referral and more accurate referral diagnosis.
在一项回顾性研究中,评估了非顾问医师连续向一家糖尿病视网膜病变专科诊所转诊的115例患者的准确性和适宜性。在整个研究过程中,转诊来源均被隐匿。根据对患者管理的情况,将转诊分为“适宜”或“不适宜”,并将转诊诊断(如有说明)与眼科医生的初步评估进行比较。评估结果分为“正确”、“部分正确”和“错误”。将在糖尿病视网膜病变诊所接受过40 - 50小时门诊培训的医师的转诊(A组,n = 49)与未接受过此类专门培训的医生的转诊(B组,n = 66)进行比较。A组的32例(65%)转诊被认为是“适宜的”,而B组中只有22例(33%)是适宜的(卡方检验,χ2 = 11.54,自由度df = 1,P < 0.001)。在有转诊诊断说明的情况下,A组的28例(67%)转诊诊断被评为“正确”,而B组只有12例(30%);B组有10例(25%)转诊诊断“错误”,A组只有2例(4.5%)(卡方检验,χ2 = 12.9,自由度df = 2,P < 0.005)。定期进行眼底镜检查并进行准确评估和采取适当措施对于预防糖尿病患者视力丧失至关重要。在糖尿病眼科诊所进行短期门诊培训可使初级医师做出更适宜的转诊和更准确的转诊诊断。