Walton-Moss Benita J, Taylor Laura, Nolan Marie T
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Prog Transplant. 2005 Sep;15(3):303-9. doi: 10.1177/152692480501500318.
In 2003, the first 3-way living kidney donor-swap was performed at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Md. Three new donor protocols includingpaired donation now allow unrelated individuals to serve as donors. Some ethicists have suggested that emotionally unrelated individuals not be permitted to donate because they will not experience the same satisfaction that a family member who is a donor experiences. Others who frame living donation as an autonomous choice do not see emotionally unrelated or even nondirected donation as ethically problematic. This article uses an ethical framework of principlism to examine living donation. Principles salient to living donation include autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The following criteria are used to evaluate autonomous decision making by living donors, including choices made (1) with understanding, (2) without influence that controls and determines their action, and (3) with intentionality. Empirical work in these areas is encouraged to inform the ethical analysis of the new living donor protocols.
2003年,首例三方活体肾捐赠交换手术在马里兰州巴尔的摩市的约翰·霍普金斯医院进行。包括配对捐赠在内的三种新捐赠方案现在允许无亲属关系的个人成为捐赠者。一些伦理学家建议,不应允许情感上无亲属关系的个人进行捐赠,因为他们不会体验到作为捐赠者的家庭成员所感受到的那种满足感。其他将活体捐赠视为自主选择的人则认为,情感上无亲属关系甚至非定向捐赠在伦理上不存在问题。本文运用原则主义的伦理框架来审视活体捐赠。与活体捐赠相关的原则包括自主性、行善和不伤害。以下标准用于评估活体捐赠者的自主决策,包括做出的选择:(1)基于理解;(2)不受控制和决定其行动的影响;(3)出于故意。鼓励在这些领域开展实证研究,以为新的活体捐赠方案的伦理分析提供依据。