Straka H, Vibert N, Vidal P P, Moore L E, Dutia M B
L.N.R.S., CNRS UMR 7060-Université René Descartes (Paris 5), Paris, France.
Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Aug;76(6):349-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
Central vestibular neurons play an important role in the processing of body motion-related multisensory signals and their transformation into motor commands for gaze and posture control. Over recent years, medial vestibular nucleus (MVN) neurons and to a lesser extent other vestibular neurons have been extensively studied in vivo and in vitro, in a range of species. These studies have begun to reveal how their intrinsic electrophysiological properties may relate to their response patterns, discharge dynamics and computational capabilities. In vitro studies indicate that MVN neurons are of two major subtypes (A and B), which differ in their spike shape and after-hyperpolarizations. This reflects differences in particular K(+) conductances present in the two subtypes, which also affect their response dynamics with type A cells having relatively low-frequency dynamics (resembling "tonic" MVN cells in vivo) and type B cells having relatively high-frequency dynamics (resembling "kinetic" cells in vivo). The presence of more than one functional subtype of vestibular neuron seems to be a ubiquitous feature since vestibular neurons in the chick and frog also subdivide into populations with different, analogous electrophysiological properties. The ratio of type A to type B neurons appears to be plastic, and may be determined by the signal processing requirements of the vestibular system, which are species-variant. The membrane properties and discharge pattern of type A and type B MVN neurons develop largely post-natally, through the expression of the underlying ion channel conductances. The membrane properties of MVN neurons show rapid and long-lasting plastic changes after deafferentation (unilateral labyrinthectomy), which may serve to maintain their level of activity and excitability after the loss of afferent inputs.
中枢前庭神经元在处理与身体运动相关的多感觉信号以及将其转化为用于眼球运动和姿势控制的运动指令方面发挥着重要作用。近年来,内侧前庭核(MVN)神经元以及在较小程度上的其他前庭神经元已在一系列物种中进行了广泛的体内和体外研究。这些研究已开始揭示它们的内在电生理特性如何与其反应模式、放电动态和计算能力相关。体外研究表明,MVN神经元有两种主要亚型(A和B),它们的峰电位形状和超极化后电位不同。这反映了两种亚型中特定钾离子电导的差异,这也影响它们的反应动态,其中A型细胞具有相对低频的动态(类似于体内的“紧张性”MVN细胞),B型细胞具有相对高频的动态(类似于体内的“动态性”细胞)。前庭神经元存在不止一种功能亚型似乎是一个普遍特征,因为鸡和青蛙的前庭神经元也可细分为具有不同类似电生理特性的群体。A型与B型神经元的比例似乎具有可塑性,并且可能由前庭系统的信号处理需求决定,而这些需求在不同物种中有所不同。A型和B型MVN神经元的膜特性和放电模式在很大程度上是在出生后通过潜在离子通道电导的表达而形成的。MVN神经元的膜特性在去传入(单侧迷路切除术)后显示出快速且持久的可塑性变化,这可能有助于在传入输入丧失后维持其活动水平和兴奋性。