Elovaara Eivor, Mikkola Jouni, Mäkelä Mauri, Paldanius Birgitta, Priha Eero
Department of Industrial Hygiene, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, FI-00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Toxicol Lett. 2006 Apr 10;162(2-3):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.09.028. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
Urinalysis of multiple polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) biomarkers has been applied to assess the exposure of soil remediation workers on a former creosote wood impregnation site polluted with creosote oil. The uptake of PAHs was measured in preshift, end-of-shift, evening, and next preshift specimens (n=33) of nine volunteers with diverse tasks, using sensitive HPLC-FD methods. The ranges of biomarker concentrations in urine (nmol/l) were: 1-naphthol (14-159), 2-naphthol (9-166), 1- plus 2-naphthol (35-269), 1-hydroxyphenanthrene (OHPhe) (6-56), 2- plus 3-OHPhe (6-70), 4-OHPhe (1-6), 9-OHPhe (1-7), the sum of phenanthrols (15-135), and 1-hydroxypyrene, OHP (2.2-67). Eight of nine workers had OHP levels higher than the Finnish biological limit value for non-occupationally exposed persons (3nmol/l). A linear correlation was observed between 1- and 2-naphthol (r=0.90). The biomarker OHP correlated well in urine both with the major (1-OHPhe, r=0.96; 2- plus 3-OHPhe, r=0.84) and the minor phenanthrene metabolites (4-OHPhe, r=0.77; 9-OHPhe, r=0.68), and with the sum of all phenanthrols (r=0.94), but not so well with the sum of naphthols (r=0.66, p<0.001). The smokers had 2.9-, 2.2-, and 4.8-fold higher average concentrations of naphthols, phenanthrols, and OHP, respectively, than the non-smokers. The PAH biomarker data (concentrations and diurnal excretion profiles) showed significant work-related exposure in both non-smoking and smoking subjects. The average exposure levels were clearly higher than those we have measured for instance in asphalt paving workers. The workers' exposure should be assessed by biological monitoring, because at this type of outdoor work the dermal and pulmonary uptake of PAHs are both likely. Adequate measures for preventing, particularly, dermal absorption are of crucial importance for reducing the workers' risk of exposure to carcinogens on soil remediation sites.
对多种多环芳烃(PAH)生物标志物进行尿液分析,已被用于评估在一个曾被杂酚油污染的杂酚油木材浸渍场地工作的土壤修复工人的接触情况。采用灵敏的高效液相色谱 - 荧光检测法(HPLC - FD),对9名从事不同任务的志愿者在班前、班末、傍晚及次日班前的样本(n = 33)中多环芳烃的摄入量进行了测量。尿液中生物标志物浓度范围(nmol/l)为:1 - 萘酚(14 - 159)、2 - 萘酚(9 - 166)、1 + 2 - 萘酚(35 - 269)、1 - 羟基菲(OHPhe)(6 - 56)、2 + 3 - OHPhe(6 - 70)、4 - OHPhe(1 - 6)、9 - OHPhe(1 - 7)、菲酚类总和(15 - 135)以及1 - 羟基芘,OHP(2.2 - 67)。9名工人中有8人的OHP水平高于芬兰非职业接触者的生物限值(3nmol/l)。观察到1 - 萘酚和2 - 萘酚之间存在线性相关性(r = 0.90)。生物标志物OHP在尿液中与主要的菲代谢物(1 - OHPhe,r = 0.96;2 + 3 - OHPhe,r = 0.84)、次要的菲代谢物(4 - OHPhe,r = 0.77;9 - OHPhe,r = 0.68)以及所有菲酚类总和(r = 0.94)相关性良好,但与萘酚总和的相关性不太好(r = 0.66,p < 0.001)。吸烟者的萘酚、菲酚类和OHP的平均浓度分别比非吸烟者高2.9倍、2.2倍和4.8倍。多环芳烃生物标志物数据(浓度和昼夜排泄谱)表明,非吸烟和吸烟受试者均存在与工作相关的显著接触。平均接触水平明显高于我们例如在沥青铺路工人中所测量到的水平。应通过生物监测评估工人的接触情况,因为在这类户外工作中,多环芳烃经皮肤和肺部吸收都有可能。采取充分措施预防,特别是预防皮肤吸收,对于降低工人在土壤修复场地接触致癌物的风险至关重要。