Xakellis George C
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, USA.
Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;37(10):719-26.
American health care consumers want the option of seeing specialists whenever they wish, but given this option, do they in fact use it without consideration of their health status? This paper reports on a cross-sectional analysis that compares the demographics and health status of fee-for-service Medicare enrollees who exhibited four different patterns of physician access.
The Medicare Beneficiary Survey data from 1998 were used. Subjects ages 65 and older were categorized into one of four groups: those with no physician claim, those who saw a generalist only, those who saw a specialist only, and those who saw both. Age, income, education, health status, level of impairment, and disease burden for the four patient groups were compared using ANOVA. Urban/rural status, race, ethnicity, mortality rates, and gender for the four patient groups were compared using chi-square. A predictive model using mutinomial logistic regression was created.
Twelve percent of subjects saw no physician in 1998, 11.6% saw a generalist only, 14.2% visited a specialist only, and 62.1% visited both types of physicians. Subjects who saw both physician types had significantly worse health status and more chronic diseases than the other groups. Subjects who saw generalists only or specialists only had intermediate levels of health status and disease burden that were not significantly different from each other. Subjects who saw a specialist only were the most affluent and highly educated group. Subjects who saw no physician had the best health status and the fewest chronic diseases of all subject groups. Urban residents were more likely to visit some type of physician than were rural residents and were more likely to see a specialist only. Regional differences were noted, with New England showing the highest rates of specialist only use.
As expected, the healthiest subjects were least likely to visit any health care provider. Subjects with the worst health status were likely to access both generalists and specialists for their care. Subjects who visited a specialist only had higher incomes, more education, and urban residence but no difference in health status when compared to subjects who visited a generalist only.
美国医疗保健消费者希望能随时选择看专科医生,但有了这种选择后,他们是否真的会不顾自身健康状况而使用这一选择呢?本文报告了一项横断面分析,该分析比较了表现出四种不同医生就诊模式的按服务收费的医疗保险参保人的人口统计学特征和健康状况。
使用了1998年医疗保险受益人调查数据。65岁及以上的受试者被分为四组之一:无医生就诊记录者、仅看全科医生者、仅看专科医生者以及既看全科医生又看专科医生者。使用方差分析比较了这四组患者的年龄、收入、教育程度、健康状况、损伤程度和疾病负担。使用卡方检验比较了这四组患者的城乡状况、种族、民族、死亡率和性别。创建了一个使用多项逻辑回归的预测模型。
1998年,12%的受试者未看医生,11.6%的受试者仅看全科医生,14.2%的受试者仅看专科医生,62.1%的受试者既看全科医生又看专科医生。看两种类型医生的受试者的健康状况明显比其他组差,慢性病也更多。仅看全科医生或仅看专科医生的受试者的健康状况和疾病负担处于中等水平,彼此之间无显著差异。仅看专科医生的受试者是最富裕且受教育程度最高的群体。在所有受试者组中,未看医生的受试者健康状况最佳,慢性病最少。城市居民比农村居民更有可能看某种类型的医生,也更有可能仅看专科医生。存在地区差异,新英格兰地区仅看专科医生的比例最高。
正如预期的那样,最健康的受试者看任何医疗服务提供者的可能性最小。健康状况最差的受试者可能会同时看全科医生和专科医生来接受治疗。仅看专科医生的受试者收入更高、受教育程度更高且居住在城市,但与仅看全科医生的受试者相比,健康状况并无差异。