Lowery Kim, Stokes Mark A
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
J Trauma Stress. 2005 Apr;18(2):171-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.20016.
This exploratory study contrasted and tested the predictive value of the reverse buffering hypothesis of social support and the information processing model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in an investigation of trauma-related symptomatology (TRS) in a single sample of 42 student paramedics. Participants completed several anonymous self-report measures of PTSD symptomatology, peer social support, and attitude toward emotional expression. Regression-based path analyses did not support either theory of PTSD in this population. A path model of PTSD in student paramedics was subsequently developed, indicating that a direct relationship exists between duty-related trauma exposure, dysfunctional peer social support, and students' negative attitudes toward emotional expression. This new model accounted for 30% of the variance in student paramedics' TRS.
这项探索性研究在对42名学生护理人员的单一样本进行创伤相关症状学(TRS)调查时,对比并检验了社会支持反向缓冲假说和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)信息加工模型的预测价值。参与者完成了几项关于PTSD症状学、同伴社会支持以及对情绪表达态度的匿名自我报告测量。基于回归的路径分析并不支持该人群中PTSD的任何一种理论。随后建立了学生护理人员PTSD的路径模型,表明与工作相关的创伤暴露、功能失调的同伴社会支持和学生对情绪表达的消极态度之间存在直接关系。这个新模型解释了学生护理人员TRS中30%的方差。