Capsule pH monitoring: is wireless more?
作者信息
Holloway R H
机构信息
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
出版信息
Gut. 2005 Dec;54(12):1672-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.069419.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Capsule pH monitoring: is wireless more?
Gut. 2005 Dec;54(12):1672-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.069419.
2
Bravo wireless versus catheter pH monitoring systems.
Gut. 2006 Mar;55(3):434-5.
3
Special report: wireless esophageal pH monitoring.
Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ. 2006 May;21(2):1-2.
4
Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
Laryngoscope. 2005 Jun;115(6):1109-13. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163757.77580.D5.
5
[Ambulatory esophageal pH-monitoring with wireless system].
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Apr-Jun;69(2):111-3.
6
[Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2004 Apr-Jun;69(2):69-75.
7
Previous wireless pH monitoring study overlooked.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 May;46(5):607; author reply 607. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181684caa.
8
Wireless pH testing as an adjunct to unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy: the safety and efficacy of transnasal telemetry capsule placement.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jul;131(1):26-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.01.019.
9
A system-on-chip digital pH meter for use in a wireless diagnostic capsule.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005 Apr;52(4):687-94. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2005.844041.
10
ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Oct;62(4):485-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.07.007.
引用本文的文献
1
Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Patient and physician communication challenges and shared decision making.
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 6;6(15):892-900. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.892.
2
Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: how do day 1 and day 2 results compare?
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug 14;13(30):4091-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i30.4091.
本文引用的文献
1
Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?
Gut. 2005 Dec;54(12):1687-92. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.064691. Epub 2005 May 28.
2
Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo).
Gut. 2005 Dec;54(12):1682-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.066274. Epub 2005 Apr 20.
3
Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Apr;3(4):329-34. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00021-2.
4
Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring--a randomized trial.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jan 15;21(2):155-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02313.x.
5
Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan;100(1):190-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41217.x.
6
Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;98(4):740-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07398.x.
7
Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities.
Dig Dis Sci. 1999 Nov;44(11):2263-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1026608804938.
8
How standard is a standard day during a standard ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;33(6):583-5. doi: 10.1080/00365529850171828.
9
Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development.
Gastroenterology. 1996 Jun;110(6):1982-96. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.1101982.
10
Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeters above lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Jun;88(6):842-6.
Zotero 插件