Samuels A
J Anal Psychol. 1992 Apr;37(2):127-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-5922.1992.00127.x.
The paper is a critical study of the intellectual relations of analytical psychology and national socialism. I try to show that it was Jung's attempt to establish a psychology of nations that brought him into the same frame as Nazi anti-semitic ideology. In addition, Jung was absorbed by the question of leadership, also a pressing issue during the 1930s. Exploring these ideas as thoroughly as possible leads to a kind of reparation, for I think that post-Jungians do have reparation to make. Then it is possible to revalue Jung's overall project in more positive terms. By coupling a less simplistic methodology and a more sensitive set of values to Jung's basic intuitions about the importance of a psychology of cultural difference, analytical psychology has something to offer a depth psychology that is concerned with processes of political and social transformation.
本文是对分析心理学与国家社会主义之间知识关系的批判性研究。我试图表明，正是荣格建立民族心理学的尝试，使他陷入了与纳粹反犹主义意识形态相同的框架。此外，荣格被领导力问题所吸引，这在20世纪30年代也是一个紧迫的问题。尽可能深入地探讨这些观点会带来一种弥补，因为我认为后荣格派确实有需要弥补的地方。然后，有可能以更积极的方式重新评价荣格的整体计划。通过将一种不那么简单化的方法论和一套更敏感的价值观与荣格关于文化差异心理学重要性的基本直觉相结合，分析心理学可以为关注政治和社会转型过程的深度心理学提供一些东西。
