Schoenl William
Michigan, USA.
J Anal Psychol. 2014 Apr;59(2):245-262. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12072.
This article first shows Jung's evolving views of Nazi Germany from 1936 to the beginning of World War II. In a lecture at the Tavistock Clinic, London, in October 1936, he made his strongest and most negative statements to that date about Nazi Germany. While in Berlin in September 1937 for lectures to the Jung Gesellschaft, his observations of Hitler at a military parade led him to conclude that should the catastrophe of war come it would be far more and bloodier than he had previously supposed. After the Sudetenland Crisis in Fall 1938, Jung in interviews made stronger comments on Hitler and Nazi Germany. The article shows how strongly anti-Nazi Jung's views were in relation to events during World War II such as Nazi Germany's invasion of Poland, the fall of France, the bombings of Britain, the U.S. entry into the War, and Allied troops advancing into Germany. Schoenl and Peck, 'An Answer to the Question: Was Jung, for a Time, a "Nazi Sympathizer" or Not?' (2012) demonstrated how his views of Nazi Germany changed from 1933 to March 1936. The present article shows how his views evolved from 1936 to the War's end in 1945.
本文首先展示了荣格在1936年至第二次世界大战开始期间对纳粹德国不断演变的看法。1936年10月,在伦敦塔维斯托克诊所的一次讲座中,他对纳粹德国发表了当时最为强烈且负面的言论。1937年9月在柏林为荣格学会讲学期间,他在一次军事游行中对希特勒的观察使他得出结论:如果战争灾难降临,其规模和血腥程度将远超他此前的想象。1938年秋苏台德危机之后,荣格在访谈中对希特勒和纳粹德国发表了更强烈的评论。本文展示了在第二次世界大战期间诸如纳粹德国入侵波兰、法国沦陷、英国遭轰炸、美国参战以及盟军挺进德国等事件上,荣格的反纳粹观点有多么强烈。舍恩尔和佩克所著的《对“荣格一度是‘纳粹同情者’吗?”这一问题的回答》(2012年)展示了他在1933年至1936年3月期间对纳粹德国的看法是如何变化的。本文则展示了他的观点在1936年至1945年战争结束期间是如何演变的。