Chen J, Matthews K S
Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251.
J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 15;267(20):13843-50.
The carboxyl-terminal sequence of the lac repressor protein contains heptad repeats of leucines at positions 342, 349, and 356 that are required for tetramer assembly, as substitution of these leucine residues yields solely dimeric species (Chakerian, A. E., Tesmer, V. M., Manly, S. P., Brackett, J. K., Lynch, M. J., Hoh, J. T., and Matthews, K. S. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1371-1374; Alberti, S., Oehler, S., von Wilcken-Bergmann, B., Krämer, H., and Müller-Hill, B. (1991) New Biol. 3, 57-62). To further investigate this region, which may form a leucine zipper motif, a family of lac repressor carboxyl-terminal deletion mutants eliminating the last 4, 5, 11, 18, and 32 amino acids (aa) has been constructed. The -4 aa mutant, in which all of the leucines in the presumed leucine zipper are intact, is tetrameric and displays operator and inducer binding properties similar to wild-type repressor. The -5 aa, -11 aa, -18 aa, and -32 aa deletion mutants, depleted of 1, 2, or all 3 of the leucines in the heptad repeats, are all dimeric, as demonstrated by gel filtration chromatography. Circular dichroism spectra and protease digestion studies indicate similar secondary/tertiary structures for the mutant and wild-type proteins. Differences in reaction with a monoclonal antibody specific for a subunit interface are observed for the dimeric versus tetrameric proteins, indicative of exposure of the target epitope as a consequence of deletion. Inducer binding properties of the deletion mutants are similar to wild-type tetrameric repressor at neutral pH. Only small differences in affinity and cooperativity from wild-type are evident at elevated pH; thus, the cooperative unit within the tetramer appears to be the dimer. "Apparent" operator binding affinity for the dimeric proteins is diminished, although minimal change in operator dissociation rate constants was observed. The diminution in apparent operator affinity may therefore derive from either 1) dissociation of the dimeric mutants to monomer generating a linked equilibrium or 2) alterations in intrinsic operator affinity of the dimers; the former explanation is favored. This detailed characterization of the purified mutant proteins confirms that the carboxyl-terminal region is involved in the dimer-dimer interface and demonstrates that cooperativity for inducer binding is contained within the dimer unit of the tetramer structure.
乳糖阻遏蛋白的羧基末端序列在342、349和356位含有亮氨酸七肽重复序列,这些是四聚体组装所必需的,因为这些亮氨酸残基的替换仅产生二聚体形式(查克里安,A.E.,特斯默,V.M.,曼利,S.P.,布雷克特,J.K.,林奇,M.J.,霍,J.T.,和马修斯,K.S.(1991)《生物化学杂志》266,1371 - 1374;阿尔贝蒂,S.,奥勒,S.,冯·威尔肯 - 伯格曼,B.,克雷默,H.,和米勒 - 希尔,B.(1991)《新生物学》3,57 - 62)。为了进一步研究这个可能形成亮氨酸拉链基序的区域,构建了一系列乳糖阻遏蛋白羧基末端缺失突变体,缺失了最后4、5、11、18和32个氨基酸(aa)。-4 aa突变体中假定的亮氨酸拉链中的所有亮氨酸都完整,它是四聚体,并且显示出与野生型阻遏蛋白相似的操纵子和诱导剂结合特性。-5 aa、-11 aa、-18 aa和-32 aa缺失突变体在七肽重复序列中缺失了1个、2个或所有3个亮氨酸,通过凝胶过滤色谱法证明它们都是二聚体。圆二色光谱和蛋白酶消化研究表明突变体和野生型蛋白具有相似的二级/三级结构。观察到二聚体和四聚体蛋白与针对亚基界面的单克隆抗体反应存在差异,这表明由于缺失导致目标表位暴露。缺失突变体在中性pH下的诱导剂结合特性与野生型四聚体阻遏蛋白相似。在升高的pH下,与野生型相比,亲和力和协同性只有很小的差异;因此,四聚体内的协同单位似乎是二聚体。二聚体蛋白对操纵子的“表观”结合亲和力降低,尽管观察到操纵子解离速率常数的变化很小。因此,表观操纵子亲和力的降低可能源于1)二聚体突变体解离为单体产生连锁平衡,或者2)二聚体的内在操纵子亲和力发生改变;前一种解释更受青睐。对纯化的突变体蛋白的详细表征证实羧基末端区域参与二聚体 - 二聚体界面,并表明诱导剂结合的协同性包含在四聚体结构的二聚体单元中。