Hollinger F B, Bremer J W, Myers L E, Gold J W, McQuay L
Division of Molecular Virology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1787-94. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1787-1794.1992.
An independent quality assurance program has been established by the Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, for monitoring virologic assays performed by nearly 40 laboratories participating in multicenter clinical trials in the United States. Since virologic endpoints are important in evaluating the timing and efficacy of therapeutic interventions, it is imperative that virologic measurements be accurate and uniform. When the quality assurance program was initially created, fewer than 40% of the laboratories could consistently recover human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of HIV-infected patients. By comparing coculture procedures in the more competent laboratories with those in laboratories who were struggling to isolate virus, optimal conditions were established and nonessential reagents and practices were eliminated. Changes were rapidly introduced into a laboratory when experience dictated that such modifications would result in a favorable outcome. Isolation of HIV was enhanced by optimizing the numbers and ratios of patient and donor cells used in cultures, by standardizing PBMC separation procedures, by using fresh rather than frozen donor PBMCs, by processing whole blood within 24 h, and by using natural delectinated interleukin 2 instead of recombinant interleukin 2 products in existence at that time. Delays of more than 8 h in the addition of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated donor cells to freshly separated patient PBMCs reduced recovery. Phytohemagglutinin in cocultures and the addition of Polybrene and anti-human alpha interferon to media were not important in HIV isolation. The introduction of a consensus protocol based on this information brought most laboratories quickly into compliance. In addition, monthly monitoring has successfully maintained proficiency among the laboratories, a process that is critical for the scientific integrity of collaborative multicenter trials. Problems which might not be appreciated for months are now being resolved early, before data can be compromised unknowingly. This consensus protocol is recommended for any laboratory attempting to isolate HIV for the purpose of standardizing recovery and for accessing virologic endpoints in clinical trials.
美国国立过敏与传染病研究所艾滋病司已设立了一个独立的质量保证项目,用于监测美国近40家参与多中心临床试验的实验室所进行的病毒学检测。由于病毒学终点对于评估治疗干预的时机和疗效很重要,因此病毒学测量必须准确且统一。质量保证项目最初设立时,不到40%的实验室能够持续从HIV感染患者的外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)中分离出人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。通过将更有能力的实验室的共培养程序与那些难以分离病毒的实验室的程序进行比较,确定了最佳条件,并去除了不必要的试剂和操作。当经验表明此类修改会带来良好结果时,就迅速将这些改变引入实验室。通过优化培养中使用的患者和供体细胞的数量及比例、标准化PBMC分离程序、使用新鲜而非冷冻的供体PBMC、在24小时内处理全血以及使用天然去糖基化白细胞介素2而非当时现有的重组白细胞介素2产品,提高了HIV的分离效率。在新鲜分离的患者PBMC中添加植物血凝素刺激的供体细胞延迟超过8小时会降低回收率。共培养中的植物血凝素以及在培养基中添加聚凝胺和抗人α干扰素对HIV分离并不重要。基于这些信息引入的共识方案使大多数实验室迅速达到了要求。此外,每月监测成功地保持了各实验室的熟练度,这一过程对于协作多中心试验的科学完整性至关重要。可能数月都未被发现的问题现在能在数据不知不觉受到损害之前及早得到解决。对于任何试图分离HIV以实现标准化回收率并获取临床试验中病毒学终点的实验室,推荐采用此共识方案。